It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The hoard of sapphires, emeralds and rubies worth hundreds of thousands of dollars was found high on one of the glaciers on Mont Blanc.
aboutface
reply to post by hknudzkknexnt
So there are still some honest people left? Woohoo! Yea! And just when I had almost given up hope.
This is a great way to start my day. I hope things work out for him and he gets amply rewarded. Keep us posted if things develop?
Scorchio
So you find a box of jewels halfway up a mountain where no-one ever goes and hand them over to the local authorities?
My guess is that they weren't reported missing and that the owner has probably been dead for a few hundred years. So are they lost?
This guy then hands them over and gets a pat on the back. Meanwhile, some bent civil servant is a few million quid richer.
Am i missing something here?
Rodinus
reply to post by Scorchio
Yep, you are missing something.
By French law, when you find treasure or valuables you have to declare it to the authorities, as if you decide to keep it and then selll you can be accused of theft.
In the case that you have found treasure or valuables of an exeptional value on your own land you still have to declare it and half goes to you whilst the other half goes to the state.
In the case of finding treasure or valuables on someone elses land the same applies apart from that you have to split your half with the land owner.
Declaring this to the authorities over here means that the treasure or valuables are cataloged so that it is identifiable when being sold to collectors or jewellers and gets you the best / highest purchase price, non declaration means that you have to sell it "under the table" so to speak and get the lowest price.
Hope that helps?
Warmest respects
Rodinus
Scorchio
reply to post by Rodinus
Thanks for the reply.
So what you're actually saying is that there is nothing remarkable or honest about handing the jewels in to the authorities and that he's done it because it's his best chance of getting something out of it. Unless of course the jewels are mysteriously recorded as stolen, in which case some bent civil servant will be a few million quid richer and the finder will receive a pat on the head.
I still fail to see anything honourable in the gesture.
"He could have kept them but he chose to turn them in because he knew they belonged to someone who probably perished," local police officer Sylvain Merly said.
Scorchio
So you find a box of jewels halfway up a mountain where no-one ever goes and hand them over to the local authorities?
My guess is that they weren't reported missing and that the owner has probably been dead for a few hundred years. So are they lost?
This guy then hands them over and gets a pat on the back. Meanwhile, some bent civil servant is a few million quid richer.
Am i missing something here?