Approval to Use a Nuclear Bomb Against Americans, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 14-11-2004 @ 10:05 AM by SIRR1
Is this more BS from AQ?
Since 9/11 AQ has been limited in its ability to produce any major, or large attacks against CONUS.

Personally, I think this is just a smoke screen or a PR stunt. AQ has been so damaged by the WOT that the only thing they can do is make announcements and boast about what they would like to do!

Former Head of CIA'S Osama Bin Laden Unit Says the Qaeda Leader Has Secured Religious Approval to Use a Nuclear Bomb Against Americans

Nov. 12 2004
Drudge Report

Osama bin Laden now has religious approval to use a nuclear device against Americans, says the former head of the CIA unit charged with tracking down the Saudi terrorist. The former agent, Michael Scheuer, speaks to Steve Kroft in his first television interview without disguise to be broadcast on 60 MINUTES Sunday, Nov. 14 (7:00-8:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network.

Scheuer was until recently known as the "anonymous" author of two books critical of the West's response to bin Laden and al Qaeda, the most recent of which is titled Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror. No one in the West knows more about the Qaeda leader than Scheuer, who has tracked him since the mid-1980s. The CIA allowed him to write the books provided he remain anonymous, but now is allowing him to reveal himself for the first time on Sunday's broadcast; he formally leaves the Agency today (12).

Even if bin Laden had a nuclear weapon, he probably wouldn't have used it for a lack of proper religious authority - authority he has now. "[Bin Laden] secured from a Saudi sheik...a rather long treatise on the possibility of using nuclear weapons against the Americans," says Scheuer. "[The treatise] found that he was perfectly within his rights to use them. Muslims argue that the United States is responsible for millions of dead Muslims around the world, so reciprocity would mean you could kill millions of Americans," Scheuer tells Kroft.

www.drudgereport.com...


reply posted on 14-11-2004 @ 09:27 PM by robin1976
:: Bin Laden's nuclear plot.


The Sunday Times - World

November 14, 2004

Bin Laden's nuclear plot.

Osama Bin Laden approached a prominent Saudi Arabian theologian to obtain religious approval for the use of a nuclear weapon against the United States, according to a senior CIA analyst who led the hunt for the Saudi-born terrorist chief, writes Tony Allen-Mills.
The theologian provided a “rather long treatise” that concluded Bin Laden was entitled to use the weapon because America was responsible for “millions of dead Muslims around the world”, said Michael Scheuer, the former head of the CIA unit dedicated to tracking Bin Laden.



Scheuer resigned from the CIA last Friday to enable him to speak freely about what he regards as the agency’s failures to take Bin Laden seriously prior to the attacks of September 11, 2001. He was previously known in intelligence circles as the anonymous author of the book Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror.

In an interview to be broadcast on the CBS 60 Minutes programme in America tonight, Scheuer says Bin Laden was criticised in some Muslim circles because he failed to provide advance warning of the September 11 attacks and, according to some interpretations of Islamic law, should first have offered to help convert his victims to Islam.

Scheuer argues that Bin Laden’s recent video appearance amounted to a warning of a future attack.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the article about what you are saying.Allegedly,Osama had asked a Saudi Arabian theologian if he could use a NBC against America,but he was told that he cant until he has exhausted the possibility of converting Americans to Islamic religion.Seen that he has no chance in doing that,a nuclear attack may be imminent.I think that Osama is definitely not bluffing and it is going to happen,soon.

[edit on 14-11-2004 by robin1976]


reply posted on 14-11-2004 @ 11:01 PM by dusty1031
hmmm, but a nuclear weapon used by them would probibly be what is called a 'dirty bomb' or a bomb loaded with radioactive material and then throws it everywhere, hence giving anyone arround radiation poisoning, as well as making it airborn, and spreading further.

To fear a full out nuclear fission or even fusion weapon is...interesting, they would have to buy it (it is possible they may have enough) from one of the nations that have nuclear weapons:

USA- LOL no way

Russia- The US will top anyone's price, we buy their nukes and destroy them

India- mabey, but we are pretty friendly, so I think not

Pakistan- the most likely source

UK-LOL no, again

Isreal-Juws helping muslums, I think not

France- no, I don't think so

N. Korea- they couldn't spare them, after all they only have a few

China- they wouldn't risk it

mabey Iraq- we've seen their weapons of mass Destructo

Mabey Iran- Mabey, but if they do have one, they wouldn't spare it

Mabey Syria- I doubt they have one, let alone one to spare

Afgan. Before they left- No, Afgan couldn't buy a nuke from the former USSR, to the north is Kazakhstan, a former USSR state that gave up even trying to produce one (ie. they couldn't buy it from the former USSR)

Hmm, so I doubt they have a weapon that will kill millions, as well it is VERY dificult to machine your own, you could, but it would require weapon's grade raidoactive material, which is kept pretty well controlled.

yup yup, so I don't think any nuclear weapon they could conjur up will kill millions.

[edit on 14/11/2004 by dusty1031]


reply posted on 14-11-2004 @ 11:34 PM by dr
Hmmmm...........

Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



ALL ATS`ers are terrorists
  Posted 2 days ago with 9 member flags
CNN Endorsing Terrorism
  Posted 5 days ago with 7 member flags
Obama\'s terror Drones.
  Posted 3 days ago with 6 member flags
Pair Detained in Twitter Homeland Threat Mix-Up
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags