posted on Sep, 25 2013 @ 11:02 PM
Proof in the modern age is a curious stew of rotted meat.
Here, proof = link. Someone feels it is proven if it is on another site, in writing, that's proof.
Proof in the science world simply means that something is presented in agree upon terms, the terms are arbitrary, but agree upon ahead of time.
Video or picture is proof, but of course it isn't.
Problem with proof as it is defined by the nuts who demand proof is they want the symbols used to express something to be common. Here is example
where it all falls apart for them. People see in three colors, so green is green. But, there are a handful of people who see in four colors, so green
is very different to them. If you say, "prove the color is green" then there is no issue amongst the three color people, but the four color person
is likely to get shot when they suggest the color is more blue then green.
Proof was not introduced to the human populace as a way of evening out the playing field, it was done to divide and you can see it on this site in
particular. Each person feels they own the process of proof, many simply because the read books or websites, or went to school. They feel their form
of logic is the standard of proof and that's that.
What proof really is, is there a way I can demonstrate my experience to you? Demonstrate, not speak, or describe, but demonstrate. If we do not agree
on how we see the world at some level - and we should not, then proof is a silly exercise in futility, as there will always be a person who sees in
four colors. I know what I know, can I prove it to you? No Can I demonstrate it to you, occasionally.