It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A local congregation near me recently had on its website a sermon given by its pastor (or whatever they call them), wherein she calls for church members to attend an upcoming pro-gay marriage rally. Say what you will about that (separate) issue, I just don't like my religion mixed up in politics any which way. It makes me question their true motivation.
The American Unitarian Conference (AUC) is a religious organization and a missionary and publication society which serves the needs of individual Unitarian believers.
It was founded in 2000 by several Unitarian Universalists who felt that the Unitarian Universalist Association (UUA) had become too theologically liberal and too political.
They decided their mission was to promote classical Unitarianism, which they argued as being based on Christian beliefs though not solely confined by them. They also hoped their organization would be of interest to non-Christians who embrace generic or philosophical theism and Deism.
There are two reasons that people act, and it can be boiled down to selfishness and compassion. Are you pointing out that I might be fearful in life because you have compassion for your fellow human being, or because you are selfishly deflecting your own fears and ignorance onto me?
The belief that the great Jehovah was offended with his creatures to that degree that nothing but the death of Christ, or the endless misery of mankind, could appease his anger, is an idea that has done more injury to the Christian religion than the writings of all its opposers, for many centuries.
The error has been fatal to the life and spirit of the religion of Christ in our world; all those principles which are to be dreaded by men, have been believed to exist in God; and professors have been molded into the image of their Deity, and become more cruel than the uncultivated savage!
A persecuting inquisition is a lively representation of the God which professed Christians have believed in ever since the apostacy.
It is every day's practice to represent the Almighty so offended with man, that he employs his infinite mind in devising unspeakable tortures, as retaliations on those with whom he is offended.
Those ideas have so obscured the whole nature of God from us, that the capacious religion of the human mind has been darkened by the almost impenetrable cloud; even the tender charities of nature have been frozen with such tenets, and the natural friendship common to human society, has, in a thousand instances, been driven from the walks of man.
But, says the reader, is it likely that persecution ever rose from men's believing, that God was an enemy to wicked man? Undoubtedly; for had all professors of Christianity believed that God had compassion on the ignorant and those who are out of the way, how could they have persecuted those whom they believe in error?
But, with contrary views, those who professed to believe in Christ, who professed to be the real disciples of him who taught his disciples to love their enemies, have been the fomenters of persecution; they have persecuted even unto death, those who could not believe all the absurdities in orthodox creeds.
I've done a bit more reading on it, particularly Hosea Ballou's Treatise on the nature and origins of Sin. His point is that An All-Knowing God KNOWS what will happen, what everyone will do, and therefore, we can't be blamed for acting in a way he KNEW we would. The UUs work on two principles: One, the Unitarian, states that there is no "Trinity" - (and there are several different 'branches' of UU 'practice'). The other, the Universalist, states that ALL RELIGIONS have truth in them; and/or ALL people will eventually reunite with the creator. Ballou, in particular, has theories on Satan (Lucifer) as the "bad guy" -
that is exactly how devils choose to operate successfully in snaring, granting enough truth to reel one in with the cunning weaving of corruption into a distorted tapestry, just as in the Garden and when the devil used scripture to tempt Christ to sin. Humanity was Positively and Lovingly Instructed from the beginning with all Good Catering Provided for the means of our further spiritual evolution and we rebelled,
See, this is what I disagree with. "We"? Who is "we", exactly?
Those who sincerely and hungrily seek Foundational Truth will find, those who knock on the doors in a love and yearning for that Spirit of Loving Creation will have it opened to them by the Holy Spirit,
As of yet, you have failed to provide as well a thought-out essay as the excerpts from Ballou that I have posted....have you read them? If not, why not??
But, you just implied that I am condemned and fallen beyond redemption because I don't subscribe to a "hellfire and brimstone" Wrathful God? What parent would condemn their child FOREVER for messing up one time???
Did you, PrimeLight, read (or even LOOK AT) the sources I provided? This is not my "original idea."
How do you justify this angry, wrathful, unforgiving God, then?? When it is clear that we are created THE WAY WE ARE....it is hard to feel guilty for the sins of others; I don't believe the Adam/Eve story, nor do I believe in original sin
How is trying to get people to give up there faith and hope helping them?
You're doing a disservice hoping to get people to give up on faith, and you wrap up a nasty evil intention in a neat little package claiming "freedom from terror", which is what Satan does also....
Satan (the evil spirit inside and all around humanity) whispers sweet lies and nothings into our hearts and we listen, to our own demise, because evil always comes wrapped up in a pretty package.....
Interesting it says that most of his ideas had "long been available to the educated elite." I'd like to look into that more. Thanks for the 'new thesis' suggestion!
The Age of Reason; Being an Investigation of True and Fabulous Theology is a pamphlet, written by a British and American revolutionary Thomas Paine, that challenges institutionalized religion and the legitimacy of the Bible, the central text of Christianity. Published in three parts in 1794, 1795, and 1807, it was a bestseller in the United States, where it caused a short-lived deistic revival.
British audiences, however, fearing increased political radicalism as a result of the French Revolution, received it with more hostility. The Age of Reason presents common deistic arguments; for example, it highlights what Paine saw as corruption of the Christian Church and criticizes its efforts to acquire political power. Paine advocates reason in the place of revelation, leading him to reject miracles and to view the Bible as an ordinary piece of literature rather than as a divinely inspired text. It promotes natural religion and argues for the existence of a creator-God.
Most of Paine's arguments had long been available to the educated elite, but by presenting them in an engaging and irreverent style, he made deism appealing and accessible to a mass audience. The book was also inexpensive, putting it within the reach of a large number of buyers.
Fearing the spread of what they viewed as potentially revolutionary ideas, the British government prosecuted printers and booksellers who tried to publish and distribute it. Paine nevertheless inspired and guided many British freethinkers of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
wildtimes
reply to post by Rex282
Thanks, much, Rex.
Appreciate your input here. Your posts are always very thoughtful, wise, and knowledgeable.
Cheers!