posted on Sep, 24 2013 @ 04:06 PM
This is getting real confusing.
All we keep hearing is one side or the other is right, all by self proclamations.
It seems the facts keep getting rearranged in favor of one side or the other.
We have whole regiments of mad scientist experts arguing with each other.
The only thing in common is the money.
Both sides are well funded.
Both sides make money from the rhetorical diatribes.
What exactly *IS* the problem anyway ?
95 per cent of intelligent people know the new IPCC report is utter drivel
Experts 95 per cent certain 'humans are responsible for global warming'.
Well, of course they are. If there is one overriding prerequisite of every new IPCC Assessment report, it's to sound even more scary and urgent and
certain than its predecessor.
Professor Bob Carter noted this progression in his excellent book Climate: the Counter Consensus:
First Assessment Report (1990) – "The observed [twentieth century] temperature increase could be largely due…to natural variability."
Second Assessment Report (1996) – "The balance of the evidence suggests a discernible human influence on climate."
Third Assessment Report (2001) – "There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last fifty years is
attributable to human activities."
Fourth Assessment Report (2007) – "Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperature since the mid-twentieth century is very
likely [= 90 per cent probable] due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations."
Money and Crisis scenario management = ??
Crisis scenarios are the means by which dictators justify control. The most often cited example is Hitler’s “Enabling Act” in the wake of the
Reichstag Fire. Another example is the “Patriot Act” in the aftermath of 9/11. Globalist organizations, behind the usual façade of the most
idealistic intentions, such as the Club of Rome, have for decades warned of impending planetary doom unless a world control system of inaugurated.
While many of the problems addressed by global control enthusiasts are real, attention is deflected away from the fact of those who are making the
suggestions for extensive global controls to deal with problems also happen to be those who created the problems in the first place. These are the
plutocrats who run a de facto globalist control system, whose aim is to turn it into a de jure system..................................
............ the 2009 UN Copenhagen Climate Change Conference ended in disarray without the formal imposition of international taxation and
bureaucracy. Lord Monckton stated of the agenda at Copenhagen: “Once again they are desperately trying to conceal from everybody here the magnitude
of what they’re attempting to do – they really are attempting to set up a world government.”
A Rothschild Plan for World Government
Who's Got the Upper Hand Now ? and Who is the ?
Who is the