It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by Hanslune
I will try to find the woman in the mountain as you here call it, the formation natural or otherwise was not named as far as I know though if artificial was hundred's of feet high, I'll try to find it but considering Mount rushmore was made by one man and completed by his son the comparison is not fair and that is a genuine modern wonder of the world in my humble opinion, still here is a fringe web page to chew over and some of it is interesting and not unrelated though I suspect you may already have seen this one.
The Important Capitol Hill of the Pre-flood Planetary Empire Atlantis
Ah the woman in the mountain, here you go.
This is not the image I was talking about but is the same formation, to my mind it look's enigmatic but what if it is really a carving made by an ancient culture?
What if the blue stone's found there and claimed to be artificial up to 50 feet down along with carved and ceramic figure's indicate a thriving and much more advanced culture in the region that may not have been in global isolation. Assuming 50 feet down and not knowing the rate of soil deposit for those find's once can only assume a great deal of time.
For comparison here is a page on the crazy horse memorial that is being carved in the state's, now if it is ever completed how do you think it will look in 10 to 12 thousand years.
The square contours in that image are clearly fake (note the normal contour level is 50m )
How much more is fake I couldn't say, but applying Ockham's Razor, I'd say this guy found a pyramidal shaped natural mound - maybe volcanic, maybe not - on the seafloor. On land we call them hills and there are several hundred thousand around the world.
There is no evidence of a manmade structure.
edit on 24-9-2013 by AndyMayhew because: (no reason given)
I can't help but find it fascinating,
I personally believe that though there is only now one definitive surviving strain of Human DNA those whom are the origin of this genetic fingerprint were not alone and though the other lineages are now bred out of us there may have been other sub groups of human's throughout the length of time modern human's have existed and maybe even before whom though they may no longer exist may have achieved at least some form of builder culture and of course throughout that same time period there were many area's where they may have lived that were then desirable habitat's but now are submerged.
I hold despite the resistance of some to the fact that Paulina Zelitski did find structures of an ancient artificial origin off of the north west of cuba though I have seen the fact's change on several internet site's such as the depth being variable, from 1275 feet on the first report's to over 2000 feet on later rendition's of the story which show's like an good fisherman's tale it has a habit of growing and likely in another 10 years if not further active on site research is conducted it will have sprouted runway's and monorail's in the story.
reply to post by Oldwindshaman
I trust your translation, but I would rather like to know how they came to this conclusion, bearing in mind the uniformity of the shape of this underwater feature. The fact that they said "Its a natural formation" is all very well, but if there is more data you could translate from the Navy, which might explain how they arrived at their conclusions, I would really love to see it posted here!
Thanks in advance,
originally posted by: Astrocyte
in all likelihood, "atlantis" was the "broken telephone" memory of ancient crete i.e the minioans.
And lastly, and most obviously, Platos story of Atlantis. This was either, a) an allegory, b) a retelling of a cultural memory. If it was the former, it has philosophical meaning. If it was the latter, it was a garbled retelling of ancient Minoan civilization.