It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.breakfornews.com...
Google Censors
VoteFraud Stories
Originally posted by Mynaeris
Has anybody ever gone to www.googlee.com... ? I am not sure what the difference is between that ans google.com. I think all the results that come up will be in english only?
Originally posted by Misfit
Originally posted by Mynaeris
Has anybody ever gone to www.googlee.com... ? I am not sure what the difference is between that ans google.com. I think all the results that come up will be in english only?
It resolves as Google Inc.
Same thing.
Don' t know why the address thing.
Same results with both searches.
Misfit
Originally posted by Murcielago
Why do you think google is dead?
Originally posted by twitchy
clearly they now answer to someone with a vested interest in censoring information,
Originally posted by Mynaeris
Nope it resolves as Google with English under the word Google unlike when you type in google.com.
Originally posted by SkyFox2
One example being they disapprove of the civil unrest that is occuring in many cities due to the US voter fraud topic.
curme
Try a Google "Image" search for "abu gharib" or any of the soldier's names involved in the scandal. You won't find one picture of an Iraqi on a leash.
www.breakfornews.com...
�[T]he Democratic Party, the Kerry campaign, the secretary of state and political experts say that while there were hiccups and glitches on Election Day, there's no chance the election was stolen, or that the results will be overturned.
"Grow up! That's what I'd tell them. Grow up. Because I frankly think this is childish," said Ryan Barilleaux, a Hanover Township resident and chairman of the political science department of Miami University of Ohio.
Barilleaux credited groundswell to Ohio's pivotal role in the election -- if Kerry backers can yet swing Ohio, they'll have Kerry in the White House -- to avenge for the 2000 election, and to the nation's "culture of litigation."
"For the last half century, any time anyone has not liked something, they've litigated it," he said. "Why should elections be any different?"
Dan Trevas, a spokesman for the Ohio Democratic Party, said many voters are driven to espousing conspiracies because they just can't believe that after such a fierce campaign, after they turned out so many votes, they actually lost.
"They're still a little shocked that Republicans turned out that many more voters considering they weren't doing the registration at the levels (Democrats) were. There's kind of this awe out there," he said.
Terry McAuliffe, the national DNC chairman, was forced to issue a statement Wednesday noting the election outcome is "undisputed." [emphasis mine]
www.chillicothegazette.com...
Originally posted by curme
Try a Google "Image" search for "abu gharib" or any of the soldier's names involved in the scandal. You won't find one picture of an Iraqi on a leash.
They censor those images. Why? I don't know.
Claim: One of the top search results in Google for the word "jew" points to an anti-Semitic site.
Status: True.
Example: [Collected on the Internet, 2004]
Upon reading in the Jewish Press that an anti-Semitic website is the first result one gets when typing in the word "Jew" on Google, the Internet's number one search engine, I contacted Google and basically got a run-around. I was told that in order for Google to rectify the problem, I would need some sort of petition with at least 50,000 names. I've taken Google at its word and have set up an online petition for people to sign � at: www.removejewwatch.com � and express their concern and disapproval. I hope you readers will help us come closer to realizing our goal.
Steven M. Weinstock
Origins: Their ability to comb the Internet places the power of fast and easy acquisition of information into our hands, but search engines also have the potential of herding information-seekers towards a few specific web pages via their ranking systems. Sites that appear high in those rankings � on the first page of search results, say, or within the top three to five entries � garner far more traffic than do similar web destinations that appear lower in the standings. For this reason, those first few spots in the rankings are considered key and are heavily prized.
Unfortunately, in the case of the word "jew," that prize is currently going to an unsavory entity.
[...]
www.snopes.com...
Originally posted by twitchy
On a side note, grady keep the political rubbish on political threads for crying out loud.