FBI calls half of populace with 9/11 doubts potential terrorists

page: 2
91
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 03:25 PM
link   
reply to post by WhiteAlice
 


Theres many different links within the article itself. But the article was written by one person, as it show at the top of the article.

The other links you posted seems to be different than the one I posted, different material I mean.

-SAP-




posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 03:26 PM
link   
The concept of the self-fulfilling prophecy comes to mind.

Government keeps insisting half the population is the enemy they're going to make enemies out of half the population.

It's like I was cool with you man. Then you started saying things about be to people and riding my ass all day for no reason whatsoever and now I'm getting pretty ticked off. So is half the neighborhood.



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 03:28 PM
link   
reply to post by SloAnPainful
 


Those links are the links within the original article you linked and the other is linking to the original source of the claim--a blog. Sounds a little Dr. Suessian but I was looking for an actual document. Considering how much b.s., disinformation, and fear mongering goes on via the net, I am really very loathe to believe what somebody claims without evidence to back it up beyond hearsay.



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 03:34 PM
link   
reply to post by WhiteAlice
 


I agree. You have to remain pretty skeptical when reading crap over the net, but there seems to be some truth in there and with 9/11 and all I can totally see the gov't doing this. They throw that "terrorist" label around like it has no meaning...

-SAP-



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 03:38 PM
link   
Their plan is to get the public to hate the government so it would fall and they can then activate a one world government which would be a lot worse under one satanic leader. Welcome to the NWO



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 03:40 PM
link   
If we look back over the major terrorist attacks in the US and UK over the past few decades, how many of the people involved had links to government agencies?. I think if it were studied it could be more than what would be considered a mere coincidence.



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 03:42 PM
link   
reply to post by SloAnPainful
 


I think the whole point of Homeland Security is to protect the Homeland, just like Nazi Germany protected their Homeland... I figure that anything could be considered terrorism eventually, if it goes against the national and corporate interests. This includes having free time, I am guessing, or free thoughts.



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 03:45 PM
link   
reply to post by WhiteAlice
 


Yea....this is just B.S. fear mongering to increase page views.

The Two police department links do not in anyway show this memo, one doesn't even work and the other specifically talks about construction site vandalism.

The BJA page doesn't seem to have the memo on it's website, nor does the FBI...

So if anyone wants people to believe this, find the memo and post it. Otherwise this is a Hoax.

Oh, Infowars. Figures.

Well keep up the Paranoia guys....try not to have a fit.
edit on 20-9-2013 by Thorneblood because: (no reason given)
edit on 20-9-2013 by Thorneblood because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 03:48 PM
link   
reply to post by SloAnPainful
 


Yeah, I'm just a stickler. Just because something feels or seems true doesn't always make it so. I definitely agree that the claim could be actual on instinct and context. You have the media trooping out "conspiracy theorist" mass murderers and other dangerous people and even Obama has said a few curious words on the subject ( to paraphrase: "reject those voices, people!"). Contextual evidence of an claim, however, only means that there is circumstantial evidence to the claim. Just doesn't guarantee it.

Like I said, I'm a stickler. Just awfully jaded and cynical at this point, lol.



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 03:48 PM
link   
What I find disturbing is that all of the attacks have happened when the government had their training simulations of the same scenario of the attacks.

Edit: Now the people wouldn't know of the actual plan and actually kill people in the process as they would think that they are using fake bombs. When really they have just wiped off a lot of people
edit on 20/9/2013 by Sk8ergrl because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 03:49 PM
link   
The criminals get the "chip" or "mark" IN their foreheads!



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 03:53 PM
link   
reply to post by WhiteAlice
 


You need to be in this day and age and I respect that.

I for one found some truth in it because, like you said, they seem to have it out for conspiracy theorists these days. It's like we can't formulate our own opinions on the event without some kind of label, "crazy", "nutjob", "whacko", or even "terrorist"... Pretty sad in my opinion.

-SAP-



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 03:55 PM
link   
reply to post by SloAnPainful
 


They are gonna say AJ made us think it!!



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 04:07 PM
link   
reply to post by AbleEndangered
 


Wont be a chip. It wont be a technological mark. The AC wil want to b eseen as God and God would not use tech on you.



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 04:09 PM
link   
reply to post by yuppa
 


So bio tech, Nano? untraceable in MRI?



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 04:30 PM
link   
And I consider them potential oppressors,funny how that works out.
I'll never shoot first unless attacked.
edit on 20-9-2013 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 04:33 PM
link   
reply to post by SloAnPainful
 


Yep. Even if they aren't directly flagging any one of us because we have an opinion contrary to the governments, that derived relationship of equating a conspiracy theorist to a whackjob acts as an inhibition to thinking outside of the box. That's the bad thing because it is within human nature to conspire and human beings aren't angels. People screw up, make bad calls, do bad things and governments are filled with and run by people. It's as simple as that. Then again, that's why my little angel on my shoulder keeps a cynical upswept eyebrow at all times because if we didn't question sources or showed some form of critical thought, how much are we helping them?



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 04:46 PM
link   
There are many discussions on the news and even have a youtube video of their broadcast. Not hard to find and tie two and two together.



Some more definations



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 04:51 PM
link   

Thorneblood
reply to post by WhiteAlice
 


Yea....this is just B.S. fear mongering to increase page views.

The Two police department links do not in anyway show this memo, one doesn't even work and the other specifically talks about construction site vandalism.

The BJA page doesn't seem to have the memo on it's website, nor does the FBI...

So if anyone wants people to believe this, find the memo and post it. Otherwise this is a Hoax.

Oh, Infowars. Figures.

Well keep up the Paranoia guys....try not to have a fit.
edit on 20-9-2013 by Thorneblood because: (no reason given)
edit on 20-9-2013 by Thorneblood because: (no reason given)


Yes, I can see that, but the Columbus police document does exist in PDF format,


www.columbuspolice.org...



posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 04:53 PM
link   
reply to post by smurfy
 


Awesome, thanks...





top topics
 
91
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join