reply to post by eso322
There's so much wrong with this OP...and I'm not just meaning the information is incorrect, but also that it is illogical.
The video is just fanatical crap; more "my way is better than that way". It's ironic that the video talks about a "house divided" when that is
all he is doing, he's just further dividing. It's one guys interpretation, but some are ready to throw away their thoughts and become mindless
sycophants. I do love the "dramatic music" and the cliche catch-phrases being thrown around.
Your doctor is mistaken on the salvation of man. According to Judeo-Christian teachings, all men sin so all men need repentance and will need
salvation through Christ. I do love the cut-and-paste jobs, the misquoting of the Word of God. The guy tries to make Paul out to be some heathen, but
that is a horrible lie. The guy quotes scripture number, but never the actual wording of the verses....hmmmmm....strange.
Master builder? That's how you're trying to tie him to Freemasonry? Really? That's stupid. It was an analogy for him establishing (aka building)
the foundations of Christianity. It wasn't a literal title. Now stepping into Freemasonry, the Royal Arch degree is not referred to as the "Master
builder" nor is it the "highest degree". The Master Mason degree is considered the highest degree in Freemasonry, but the Royal Arch degree
completes the story of Ancient Craft Masonry. As to Freemasonry's origins, our legend takes us back to the time of the building of King Solomon's
Temple, but as to actual recorded history well, that gets much more trickier and brings us much closer to our time than the pre-Christian era.
Freemasonry is not known for using aliases. That's just as absurd as it moronic. At 9:57 they try to show how the Square & Compass is really the Star
of David, but what they don't realize is that they are not one and the same. The Square is an instrument to measure right angles so it needs to be
90-degrees while clearly the Star of David is not (more like 60-degrees). The angle of the compasses is not necessarily set usually lying near the
edge of each arm of the Square, but I could go into the lessons of the point within the circle and tying it back to the angle of ones compasses.
Francis Bacon was also Shakespeare?
You're really off your rocker. The video's narrator throws logic out the window when he talks about the
Jew named Apollos, citing that it was spelled Apollonius, as if that was the only way that name could be written. If this is the logic he uses and
people by it, then they deserve to be misled by his ignorance. I also doubt that there was only ever one Apollonius ever in all of history. By this
video's logic just because my friend Marcus and I are friends with the same people we must be the same person. Or that I'm friends with a guy
several mutual friends on Facebook with me, and because he and I traveled to the same areas talking about Freemasonry, we're probably the same guys.
Paul and Apollo have two different etymological origins. Nor is Saul the anglicized version of "sol". Saul is actually the Latinized version of the
Hebrew word "Shaul" which means "asked for". God, people do research before making crap up.
What's wrong with the teachings of Pythagoras. He's mentioned in Freemasonry, but he's not some major figure like the video tries to make out. This
video is horribly ignorant on Freemasonry as it is on Christianity. I do love the mix and matching of stories to suit some ignorant agenda though.
Also, when talking about the two Lamech's the video states one was from Adam's line and one from Cain's, wouldn't both be Adam's line as Cain was
of Adam? I paused at this point, but I can already guess that the video is going to try and tie Paul, thus Freemasonry to the Cain and say we are evil
and blah blah blah. [a few seconds pass] Oh, what do you know? I was right, but alas the video is putting out completely wrong information. Shocking
to see false information coming from an anti-Mason. I also love the use of fear to coerce people to follow their side.
The creator of this video is nothing more than another false prophet or wolf in sheep's clothing. In that video, I saw a lot of conjecture, but no
proof. The problem with it all, is that it either he's lying for some purpose, he's deranged, or his mistaking his perception with fact.
"Do not mistake the shadow for the reality, for in everything the vulgar habitually do so, they turn their backs to the light and wonder at the
shadow that they themselves project."