It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
NASA's Mars rover Curiosity has revealed no trace of methane, a potential sign of primitive life, on the Martian surface, contradicting past evidence of the gas spotted by spacecraft orbiting the Red Planet, researchers say.
The Mars methane discovery, or rather the lack thereof, adds new fuel to the debate over whether the gas is truly present on Mars. And not all scientists are convinced that methane is missing on Mars.
The first and only attempts to search for life on Mars were the Viking missions, launched in 1975. Those probes failed to find organic compounds in Martian soils, apparently ruling out the possibility of extant life on the Red Planet.
Methane — the simplest organic molecule — was first discovered in the Martian atmosphere by the European Space Agency's Mars Express spacecraft in 2003. On Earth, much of the atmospheric methane is produced by life, such as cattle digesting food. Methane is suspected to be stable in the Martian atmosphere for only about 300 years, so whatever is generating this gas did so recently.
Still, there are ways to produce methane without life, such as volcanic activity. ESA's ExoMars spacecraft planned for launch in 2016 will study the chemical composition of Mars' atmosphere to learn more about this methane.
Phobos 1 was “lost” while Phobos 2 was able to establish an orbit around the Mars moon Phobos when it was “attacked” by a still unexplained space craft that showed itself in the last image beamed back to Earth before it was destroyed.
As some experts have noted that Phobos may be an “ancient spacecraft” marooned in Mars orbit, this report continues, the possibility that Comet ISON may be one too cannot be ruled out either.
SasquatchHunter
reply to post by cheesy
Didn't know about the methane. Thanks. Gilbert Levin has been convinced since the Viking missions there is microscopic life on Mars. Plenty of other space objects with traces of microscopic life. Seems legit. Why not Mars?
wildespace
Perhaps Curiosity is simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Methane emission on Mars may be localised and seasonal.
NiZZiM
reply to post by cheesy
This also confused me. I have seen many reports that have satellite pictures of huge methane plumes rising up from mars surface....so where are these sporadic plumes coming from if they cant be measured in the atmosphere by Curiosity?? maybe its like the movie Contact and there are aliens on mars with huge greenhouse gas machines releasing bursts of methane into the atmosphere to make it eventually habitable?
James1982
wildespace
Perhaps Curiosity is simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Methane emission on Mars may be localised and seasonal.
Yeah really.
I cannot fathom of anybody of science would declare there is no life on Mars based on a lack of methane. Why on Earth (or Mars in this case) would they think a tiny tiny craft that wanders around a tiny tiny section of Mars would have ANY authority on what the rest of the planet holds? That seems to go past arrogance onto straight up stupidity.
If you took a cup of water from the ocean and found no fish, does that mean the ocean is devoid of fish? That's basically what they are doing here. Complete and utter stupidity, how these people get jobs doing this is something I cannot fathom.
OccamsRazor04
James1982
wildespace
Perhaps Curiosity is simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Methane emission on Mars may be localised and seasonal.
Yeah really.
I cannot fathom of anybody of science would declare there is no life on Mars based on a lack of methane. Why on Earth (or Mars in this case) would they think a tiny tiny craft that wanders around a tiny tiny section of Mars would have ANY authority on what the rest of the planet holds? That seems to go past arrogance onto straight up stupidity.
If you took a cup of water from the ocean and found no fish, does that mean the ocean is devoid of fish? That's basically what they are doing here. Complete and utter stupidity, how these people get jobs doing this is something I cannot fathom.
Great now show me where NASA is saying there is 100% no life on Mars. I will wait for your link.
And just an FYI: A cup of water would have an abundance of life.