"We The People" - Common Law Rebuttal of US Corporation's public notice

How say you the people on this document?

www.infowars.com...

Common Law Rebuttal of US Corporation's public notice

The above article appears to be the US Corporation's public notice of their intent to have a nuclear incident on American soil.
Since they are de facto and there is a de jure body politic established and according to the US Corporation's own rules that a de jure assembly has superior lawful standing to a de facto assembly, We THE People being of the de jure assembly do hereby formally rebut the US Corporation's public notice and are noticing you the de facto United States of America government also known as the US Corporation and all of your agents that we do not accept you proposal nor are we going to enter into contract with you on this endeavor by being silent.

We THE People are telling you with a resounding NO this proposed action is not acceptable and it will not be carried out. Just a reminder to all of you who work in, for or with the US Corporation; none of you de facto actors, agents and contractors have immunity from prosecution as of 1 September 2013 Apostolic Letter by the Pope and the Declaration of Contempt of the Constitution for the United States of America is now lawful legislation.

You have been noticed.
Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent.

Interesting , I personally would like to add quite a few more items to it .

Whenever you see this statement you can probably be assured the information is false.

According to the high level military source, who has a strong record of continually being proven correct in deep military activity,

reply to post by Tinkerpeach


Ok then , Question: How would you leak information to the general public , given that your Government and it's agents were corrupt and your life may be in danger?

Pinkorchid
reply to post by Tinkerpeach

 

Ok then , Question: How would you leak information to the general public , given that your Government and it's agents were corrupt and your life may be in danger?

Well first of all, your article says nothing about corrupt officials, it deals with speculation of an impending world war based on the movement of nuclear warheads.

Second of all, unless the US and Russia have found out a way to win a nuclear exchange in the past 20 years, it isn't going to happen.

Thirdly, if the two nations were preparing for war it would very obvious and there would be no reason to leak the information. Resources would be consolidated, troops would be put on active duty, armaments would be readied across the board, there would be so much activity there is no way you could hide it.

We see nothing on this scale happening, in fact, most of Russia's forces are sitting quietly with the exception of a little activity in Syria, certainly nothing that would indicate they are preparing to fight a war with America.

This isn't something that just happens in secret.

How say you the people on this document?

reply to post by Pinkorchid


If true, and things actually escalate to this point, I will probably resort to the teachings/programmings of early childhood.

In the link you provided, what jet is that pictured taking off? B-1,B-2, vitamin B-12? lol....pretty sure it was designed strictly to deliver "special" weapons. Not that the photo has any bearing on the report, just think it is a cool looking aircraft.

reply to post by Tinkerpeach


I asked you the question in relation to this statement of yours:-

Whenever you see this statement you can probably be assured the information is false.

You have not, yet clarified why and how you come to this conclusion.

I presume you mean that if they don't give their name address and social security number, then their fake and not telling the truth.
It does beg the question :- If you don't want to have your life put in danger , would it not be a salient concept to keep that sort of information quite?

So the fact they want to keep their identity quite makes you find this to be an indication that they are not telling the truth.

Curios

reply to post by Tinkerpeach

Second of all, unless the US and Russia have found out a way to win a nuclear exchange in the past 20 years, it isn't going to happen.

You speak in absolutes " it isn't going to happen" , who has guaranteed that to you and can we all see the document?

And " found out a way to win a nuclear exchange " , surely the meaning of word "Win" in your statement needs to be examined.

What guarantee do you have that it will be only an all or nothing exchange?
Again from what source do you get this information?

One such event has already occurred and that did not result in total world wide destruction.

Also do you believe that should the U.S be about to launch a nuclear attack that they would broadcast it to the world .
Surely these sort of preparations would be highly guarded and not common knowledge to the likes of you or I.
But then maybe you do have access to greater knowledge about this than most , you seem to hint at it.

An un-named source reported on infowars?

I'd put dollars on it being bupkiss.

As for the source being found reliable in the past.....when? where? Has infowars ever been reliable about anything??

Where's Heff?

*sigh* Try using "common law" yourself and see how far you get.

You can't create your own grand juries, and redemption/sovereign schemes are nothing but lies and trouble.

Pinkorchid
reply to post by Tinkerpeach

 

I asked you the question in relation to this statement of yours:-

Whenever you see this statement you can probably be assured the information is false.

You have not, yet clarified why and how you come to this conclusion.

I presume you mean that if they don't give their name address and social security number, then their fake and not telling the truth.
It does beg the question :- If you don't want to have your life put in danger , would it not be a salient concept to keep that sort of information quite?

So the fact they want to keep their identity quite makes you find this to be an indication that they are not telling the truth.

Curios

Well to clarify I would point you to the hundreds of threads on this site alone where someone has claimed something will happen based on an unknown expert source.

Not sure what more you would require.

Pinkorchid

reply to post by Tinkerpeach

Second of all, unless the US and Russia have found out a way to win a nuclear exchange in the past 20 years, it isn't going to happen.

You speak in absolutes " it isn't going to happen" , who has guaranteed that to you and can we all see the document?

And " found out a way to win a nuclear exchange " , surely the meaning of word "Win" in your statement needs to be examined.

What guarantee do you have that it will be only an all or nothing exchange?
Again from what source do you get this information?

One such event has already occurred and that did not result in total world wide destruction.

Also do you believe that should the U.S be about to launch a nuclear attack that they would broadcast it to the world .
Surely these sort of preparations would be highly guarded and not common knowledge to the likes of you or I.
But then maybe you do have access to greater knowledge about this than most , you seem to hint at it.








1. History has guaranteed that before a war between major powers breaks out that there are always certain things that happen beforehand, none of which are currently occurring in either Russia or the US.

2. The point of win is that in a nuclear exchange between Russia and the US there will be no winner. This is why it won't happen.

3. It will be all or nothing because once the US gets hit with one missile our policy is complete destruction which includes their silo sites, their mobile launchers, their powerplants, their cities, and anything else deemed of value. It was this policy that has prevented any nuclear use by any country to date and as far as I know we have not changed that policy.

4. That one event didn't escalate because nobody else had atomic weapons.

5. The US won't simply launch an attack for no reason. Leading up to any nuclear exchange will be a conflict with conventional forces or missiles already on their way here. We saw this in the Cuban Missile Crisis..that is a likely scenario that everyone will see. If you believe that the US or Russia are just going to start lobbing missiles for the hell of it you don't understand international politics.

6. As for preparation, that is to be expected during any possible conflict with a powerful enemy. Its been quite awhile since we had to prepare our forces against a possible conflict with Russia. I would be shocked and surprised if the US military was not taking every precaution available to them in the event something does go south. The movement and re-placement of nuclear weapons in no way indicated the possibility of a launch.