It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If you take a look at some of the masonry in South America’s megalithic structures and walls, such as the 12-sided stone at Cuzco, Peru, you’ll notice immediately that things are lining up awfully well—and extremely tightly.
The “standard” explanation is that the Incans somehow managed to use a “guess and check” method of chipping at the stone with their stone tools, then setting the stone in place, seeing how it fit, then lifting it up and chipping further, then checking again, and so on.
But for a society with only primitive tools available, and no advanced engineering, how are 100-ton stones moved through 20 miles of mountains?
In fact, the Incans themselves acknowledged to the conquistadores that these structures were there long before them, built by a different people. A favorite topic of speculation among the Incans was apparently trying to figure out how the ancients actually built the walls, fitting the stones in so tightly
So we’re faced with the possibility of a civilization much more advanced than the Incans, but of which we know almost nothing about—except that they could create structures like Saksaywaman
Explorers, such as the legendary Percy Fawcett, also brought back tales of such a substance, as did Hiram Bingham, who (re)discovered Machu Picchu. Furthermore, Jorge A. Lira, a Catholic priest, in 1983 said he was able to recreate this stone softening, but was unable to figure out how to make the stones hard again.
But how could the Incans have managed to construct, with extreme precision, structures like Saksaywaman, with stones as heavy as 150 tons nesting and dovetailing neatly together, with no evidence of the needed technology?
He carried out several experiments and, although he managed to soften solid rock, he could not reharden it, and therefore considered his experiments a failure.4 Aukanaw, an Argentine anthropologist of Mapuche origin, who died in 1994, related a tradition about a species of woodpecker known locally by such names as pitiwe, pite, and pitio; its scientific name is probably Colaptes pitius (Chilean flicker), which is found in Chile and Argentina, or Colaptes rupicola (Andean flicker), which is found in southern Ecuador, Peru, western Bolivia, and northern Argentina and Chile. If someone blocks the entrance to its nest with a piece of rock or iron it will fetch a rare plant, known as pito or pitu, and rub it against the obstacle, causing it to become weaker or dissolve. In Peru, above 4500 m, there is said to be a plant called kechuca which turns stone to jelly, and which the jakkacllopito bird uses to make its nest. A plant with similar properties that grows at even higher altitudes is known, among other things, as punco-punco; this may be Ephedra andina, which the Mapuche consider a medicinal plant.5
thumbs.dreamstime.com...
Battlefresh
I found this website amazing davidpratt.info...
‘They make the holes themselves.’ The words were spoken by a man who had spent a quarter of a century in the forests. ‘I’ve seen how they do it, many a time. I’ve watched, I have, and seen the birds come to the cliff with leaves of some sort in their beaks, and cling to the rock like woodpeckers to a tree while they rubbed the leaves in a circular motion over the surface. Then they would fly off, and come back with more leaves, and carry on with the rubbing process. After three or four repetitions they dropped the leaves and started pecking at the place with their sharp beaks, and – here’s the marvellous part – they would soon open out a round hole in the stone. Then off they’d go again, and go through the rubbing process with leaves several times before continuing to peck. It took several days, but finally they had opened out holes deep enough to contain their nests. I’ve climbed up and taken a look at them, and, believe me, a man couldn’t drill a neater hole!’
The Incas inherited fortresses and cities built by a previous race and restored from a state of ruin without much difficulty. Where they themselves built with stone – in the regions where stone was the most convenient material, for in the coastal belt they generally used adobe – they adopted the same incredible mortarless joints that are characteristic of the older megalithic edifices, but made no attempts to use the huge stone masses favoured by their predecessors. I have heard it said that they fitted their stones together by means of a liquid that softened the surfaces to be joined to the consistency of clay.
The most recent style is Spanish. Perhaps the most primitive of all, it is characterized by the masonry and tiled roofs so common throughout colonial South America. The Incan construction of 500 to 1000 years ago is evident on top of the larger, more perfect, more ancient works. This Incan technique is easily recognized by its square or rectangular blocks, typically weighing from 200- to 1000-pounds [90 to 450 kg]. Beneath it we find the megalithic construction of odd-angled blocks weighing from 20- to 200-tons, all perfectly fitted together.
Hanslune
This subject comes up on a regular basis, usually about every three months
Some notes:
Spanish-Incan's wrote about their culture and noted that rocks were dragged and how masons did their work in a general way.
Yes the Incan noted that earlier people built things that they used because the Inca's were late to the game coming into power in the 15th century AD. They even used the skilled masons of the tribes they conquered.
No sign of a super advanced race moving rocks around just the Inca and the many skilled empires and civilizations in western south America.
Will we ever know exactly how the skilled mason did it? No they left no records and the Spanish didn't take detailed notes of the construction methods - which were occurring during the time they were arrived and afterwards.
I'd suggest if you are interested in this subject to go and find one of the many earlier threads on this subject. All the present claims were addressed in them, plus there is a great deal of interesting information in those threads beyond what was presented in this OPedit on 19/9/13 by Hanslune because: added a note
kdog1982
Yes sir,these things have brought many times,hence the loss interests on my part.
I respect your input,because of your knowledge in this area,but there is always something new that comes along to changes that way we THINK of how things are. The reason you are on here.
A new perspective is always a good thing.
Peace,
K
, is that more than twenty thousand Indians dragged the stone with stout cables. They proceeded with great difficulty, as the road was very rough, and passed up and down many steep mountains. Half the people hauled upon the cables in front, while the other half held on behind ... In one of these steep places (where, through carelessness, they were not all hauling with equal force) the weight of the stone overcame the force of those who held it, and it slipped down the hill, killing three or four thousand Indians who were guiding it. Notwithstanding this disaster, they raised it up, and brought it to the place where it now lies.
kdog1982
Yes,I believe it was possible.
A few years ago ,I discussed this on ATS ,and there was this bird that used a certain plant to dissolve granite walls on a cliff to make a nesting hole in it.
Let me see if I can go dig that up for you.
I think you already quoted this but I will share the discussion.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
And a link on making cements with plant extracts......
www.geopolymer.org...
Hanslune
Spanish-Incan's wrote about their culture and noted that rocks were dragged and how masons did their work in a general way.
No sign of a super advanced race moving rocks around just the Inca and the many skilled empires and civilizations in western south America.
Will we ever know exactly how the skilled mason did it? No they left no records and the Spanish didn't take detailed notes of the construction methods - which were occurring during the time they were arrived and afterwards.
will2learn
kdog1982
Yes,I believe it was possible.
A few years ago ,I discussed this on ATS ,and there was this bird that used a certain plant to dissolve granite walls on a cliff to make a nesting hole in it.
Let me see if I can go dig that up for you.
I think you already quoted this but I will share the discussion.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
And a link on making cements with plant extracts......
www.geopolymer.org...
Kdog
I don't doubt that certain birds will have some acidic spit that will dissolve a bit of stone over time. However this theory is a giant red herring in the search for a reasonable solution. I mean how on earth does one collect a few gallons of bird spit? the same goes for the plant extract, they would need industrial levels of production to soften Cuzco.
Your geopolymer link is more likely a solution. It is only part of the answer. There are many techniques on display in Peru. from natural hammer stoned to geopolymers.
Will