Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

David Attenborough: Stop Feeding Third World Nations to Reduce Population

page: 3
6
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:24 AM
link   

Eryiedes
I am just guessing but it was probably Kisszinger or Phillip Battenburg.


Seems that they want to get rid of the "useless eaters".

I guess those in third world countries don't have the opportunity to be as productive as the rest of the world, so they must go...




posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Eryiedes
 

maybe someone should stop feeding david and his friends,or maybe he can just build a ship and get off our planet and take his friends with him.after all,no one has asked him to stay,he can leave at any time.



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:31 AM
link   

Tidnabnilims
reply to post by Eryiedes
 


Its taken out of context

Here is the original article

www.telegraph.co.uk...

Had you actually looked up the name and not linked it to Jurassic Park purely from a comment from a poster you would have easily found out who was who (Richard is his brother).

So you use straw-man arguments, some ad hominem attacks on posters who point out your errors, and failed on even the most cursory bit of research into the person.

Good job.
edit on 19-9-2013 by Tidnabnilims because: link insert fail
edit on 19-9-2013 by Tidnabnilims because: Link insert not working properly, random space gets added after submission


I also admitted I was wrong (about the name only) and said he was entitled to "payback" just as you are entitled to your take on events.
I did get the name wrong in my haste to post and didn't realize "can I be of further assistance" would be regarded as fighting words but as you can tell I am new here.
I suppose you never made any mistakes either.
Do you have something to add about the topic hand or is pointing out what have already come to realize the jist of it?

-Peace-

edit on 19-9-2013 by Eryiedes because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:32 AM
link   
Mistaken Post
edit on 19-9-2013 by Eryiedes because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:34 AM
link   
reply to post by Eryiedes
 


Yes I have brought to the thread the facts that the article misquotes the original, takes it completely out of context and even says that David says the opposite of what was actually said, maybe you should read the actual article instead of someone elses re-write

I also added a link to the original article, which you did not
edit on 19-9-2013 by Tidnabnilims because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:36 AM
link   
reply to post by Eryiedes
 


You didnt even know who he was but you will take some random dude with an axe to grind over what the actual person actually said
Very poor



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:36 AM
link   

Tidnabnilims
reply to post by Eryiedes
 


Yes I have brought to the thread the facts that the article misquotes the original, takes it completely out of context and even says that David says the opposite of what was actually said, maybe you should read the actual article instead of someone elses re-write

I also added a link to the original article, which you did not
edit on 19-9-2013 by Tidnabnilims because: (no reason given)


Thank you for your time and effort sir.

-Peace-



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:37 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:37 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:39 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:40 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:42 AM
link   
reply to post by dellmonty
 


Which of David's friends are you referring to, had you even heard his name prior to this ? Yet you know his social circle .....



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:46 AM
link   
reply to post by Eryiedes
 





Well, it turns out that the ‘sensitivities’ blocking the decimation of the world’s human population include ‘the right to have children’. How truly horrible. Instead, it seems Attenborough thinks that we should revoke the right of citizens to even have children, let alone feed the existing humans in hungry nations. In the interview, Attenborough states:



Revoking right for people to have children sounds ok in a world which is suffering population starvation problems. Do you have a better idea?



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:48 AM
link   
reply to post by Eryiedes
 


Ad hominem again, and presumptive.

I am simply doing what you did not, provide the source material in context (the actual article), and then attacking the misrepresentation of that article.

I'll simplfy though

Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish however ......

Education > Charity

Wear a johnny
edit on 19-9-2013 by Tidnabnilims because: is contraception a myth or something ?



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:52 AM
link   

Tidnabnilims
reply to post by Eryiedes
 


Ad hominem again, and presumptive.

I am simply doing what you did not, provide the source material in context (the actual article), and then attacking the misrepresentation of that article.

I'll simplfy though

Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish however ......

Education > Charity


Somebody needs a time out.
I can see why your scores are so skewed now.
I am willing to consede I made some errors and even compounded them with some more...but now your just acting like a total d-bag.
You have my sympathy.

-Peace and a hug to you-



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:54 AM
link   
reply to post by Eryiedes
 


Couldnt care less about a score on some corner of the internet (but you clearly think its important, is that the real reason you are here, ego ?), what matters is that lies are not perpetrated as truth which is what the author of that article you presented is doing.
edit on 19-9-2013 by Tidnabnilims because: deserved a snipe



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 04:57 AM
link   
reply to post by Eryiedes
 


Adding more ad-hominem phrases just shows your lack of sincerity in finding out the truth.
Although I hope this encourages you to think a little about what you are posting in future and doing a small bit of research prior.




posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 05:02 AM
link   

Tidnabnilims
reply to post by Eryiedes
 


Couldnt care less about a score on some corner of the internet, what matters is that lies are not perpetrated as truth


And temper tantrums are?
I'm sorry but you don't seem to be capable of waiting for me to read your link and seem determined to attack anyone who comes into range.
You should turn those "finely tuned" sences of yours towards a mirror.
They would do you a service.
In the meanwhile I will be forced to make a formal complaint about you if you don't at least make an attempt to tone your aggression down.
This thread isn't here for you to throw a tantrum.

-Good day to you sir-



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 05:06 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 05:20 AM
link   
So, Agenda 21 and the depopulation Attenborough envisons can be summed up by Mark Metheny's NWO expose.

(Don't let the the opening moments of the clip fool you...this is NOT Zeitgeist)

www.youtube.com...

The pink & fuzzy Attenborough is an illusion I just don't buy.
Birth control equates to forced sterilizations.
What OTHER word play are they trying to slide past us?
Once they are done culling Africa....they will turn their full attention upon all of us.
Don't ever just take anyone's word for it...even from those who claim they know.
Knowledge is assimilated best when you find it for yourself and not falling from the lips of some demagogue.
Uncovering the truth is the journey we face in life.
Will you choose the easy path or the road less traveled?

-Peace be with you-

(Well, almost all of you...)





new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join