posted on Sep, 18 2013 @ 10:24 PM
I know that the ATS admins, mods and some members hate this subject down to the very bone so I will try to keep this very short and to the point out
of respect for everyone in a community I am a part of and have a lot of respect for.
The appropriate time has passed where the questions we all had about this event should have been answered. In fact, most dissenters said months ago,
wait, just wait, the reporters got it all wrong in the heat of the moment but it will be explained.
It hasn't been explained. If anything, the amount of time that has gone by and given the amount of factual evidence that is quite frankly just
missing is troubling. I'm going to approach this in a very rational fashion because I don't really have to be irate to state that this entire story
is a complete and total farce from start to finish.
Maybe kids died that day, if they did, my heart goes out but what I can say for sure is that if kids did die that day, it wasn't Adam Lanza that
killed them. Who was it then? Good question, somebody should ask the "off duty" tactical officer chased down in the woods that fled the scene.
Chances are, he may have some answers right? Well, that would be a problem because even though we have video evidence of it happening and
confirmation through media of who he was, nobody has said anything from that day to this about why he was at the school or why he would be running
from the police through the woods at the exact same time as the shooting..... Hmmmmm
Gene Rosen is a proven liar. I can prove that he lied about everything he has said. Not once in this whole situation has any official source came out
to back Gene Rosen's accounts of the event, thats strange, is it not? Should not the government, those in charge herald Gene Rosen as the greatest
thing since sliced bread? Perhaps they should but because his story and the way he choose to tell it is so outrageous and is so easily proven to be
false, they just ignore that part of the story all together..... Why is that? lol
The major news networks posted children that were not dead, that did not go to Sandy hook on their website as the children that were killed, how did
that happen? The principle was reported to make a statement when she was reported to be a casualty. Not one child talking about the event has cried or
been traumatized, instead of crying, parents on television stroke their significant other in a strange way, smile, laugh or state an anti gun measure
they would like to see. They introduce their childrens absence with a letter that advocates and begs for gun control and asks they only be available
to law enforcement.
This whole Sandy Hook scenario is such a farce, I actually laugh when people try to argue and ask for "proof" or evidence. It is so completely bogus
that it becomes "indefensible". You know what though, I'm a good sport and I in many cases WANT to be wrong. I wish my government wasn't full of a
bunch off asshats that does this to their own constituents but I know better.
So, in fairness, If you dispute my claims about Sandy Hook, please tell me why. I will be happy to educate you on the evidence.