posted on Sep, 18 2013 @ 10:07 PM
reply to post by buster2010
I was thinking there might be something a little more reliable and recent than a field report from 1948. Err.. Something perhaps living people today
may have at least been around to know about, if not be connnected to? I'm not sure what to make of that 40's report, but the age alone makes it
about as interesting as the Japanese Bio weapons use against China a few years before that. Flea bombs...among other things. Crazy stuff...and from a
whole different era of time.
Anything in the last 20-40 years perhaps? I had noticed another document linked from the US Government about proliferation of weapons. They are
obviously right on the Nuclear part, and Israel had one of it's own Mossad agents go 'whistle blower' to first let that kitty loose on the world
stage. I'm sure you're aware of that ..and of the fact even he hadn't mentioned a Biological weapons program. There is a WORLD of difference
between industrial production of what amounts to pesticide and weed killer (Chemical) with a twist ....vs... Bio-Level IV labs where you need very
specialized, very expensive and very noticeable equipment in place to even handle the stuff and expect to live much longer, afterward.
I'm not sold on the idea Israel has had any meaningful CW program in modern times, when they went to the top and grabbed the brass ring right from
the start with Nuclear. Nothing trumps that, so why screw with the domestic headaches and practical dangers of even storing effective CW? Most
nations? Well... That's a stupid question. Then again, most nations don't have 80 nuclear warheads at last estimate, either.
Your article makes a habit of using the 3 classes of weapons interchangeably in not only general ways but specific references as well. Bad reporting
...but then, is it reporting from a site named "Intifada; Voice of Palestine", or is it propaganda, the same as every Government runs out the door
these days? The way it reads? Hard to say, IMO.
Oh.... Another thing I noticed about that USG Report
your source references,
(interesting, BTW, how selective folks are about when they DO and do NOT believe USG material...), they DO reference Israel for both Chemical and
Biological weapons programs in general and non-specific terms. They also reference Iraq (Wrong since the early 90's), Libya (Wrong since 2003), Iran
and ...... Taiwan (oops.. We sell them high end conventional stuff, regularly). So, when are we busting down Taiwanese doors and demanding they turn
over their Chemical and Biological weapons? After all...the belief Taiwan have them is the same basis Israel is being accused, in this context.