According to the UN Report Ghouta,Damascus CW Rocket Range (9km ) Very Short Range.
Ghouta CW reported on Aug 20 during the evening Hours
Further more these same Missile Rockets that have allegedly attacked East Ghouta,Damascus have not caused any major damage, but rather it missed
quite a lot of its target.
Ironical enough Human Right Watch has released a map claiming to show the Missile Rockets it from the Syrian Army Arab military base in Damascus.
Regarding Human Right Watch map, I believe the 9km range for UNs 345 missile is a joke. But wouldn't be precision shooting? Aerodyn/Ballistics
terrible,you would fill w/50l Sarin,shoot it 9 km acc to Hrw map, during the middle of night?
If the precision of the supposed alleged Missile Rockets didn't come with it, then perhaps the interventionists could explain and really think this
rocket design can go 9 km? this is something that the Syrian Arab Army doesn't have.
The Desperate Washington Post Using the HRW Map.
Still doubt Assad’s forces were behind Syria’s chemical attack? Look at this map.
One of the most damning details from the United Nations investigation has to do with where the the sarin-filled artillery shells appear to have been
fired from. They appeared to sail in from the northwest – from a part of Damascus that just happens to be tightly controlled by Syrian regime forces
and to contain a large Republican Guard base. Human Rights Watch, which conducted its own investigation that concluded that the Assad regime was
likely responsible, actually put together this map of the attacks based on the U.N. data. It seems to point pretty squarely to the Assad regime:
Note how they desperately defend the rebels as pure innocent.
"Viewed through a common-sense understanding of the limits and conditions of the battlefield, the rebels could not have done this," he writes. "Claims
of rebel culpability are now specious; technically and tactically implausible, they are too outlandish for even a sci-fi script."
Right the FSA are too outlandish for even a sci-fi script. Lets ignore the FSA raids on SAA bases to.
As usual the Washington Post defending Obama, attacking Putin, Russia while ignoring an important p[art of the same they are citing from.
Page 22 Of The Same UN report
— that rebels launched sarin gas at Syrian civilians to provoke a Western response — look a lot harder to defend.
page 22: "As with other sites, the locations have been well travelled by other individuals prior to the arrival of the Mission...During the time
spent at these locations, individuals arrived carrying other suspected munitions indicating that
"SUCH POTENTIAL EVIDENCE IS BEING MOVED AND POSSIBLY MANIPULATED".
You would think and assume the Syrian Arab Army had the time to move and Manipulate everything on that day so fast? only an idiot would believe
Interesting comment from a user at the Washington Post.
5.The US government claims to have slam-dunk evidence of where the missiles were fired from. The US government has never claimed any missile was
fired from this military complex, or from anywhere near it.
What the user had commented is pretty much spot on. As you remember the state department had only released a four page documentation presentation of
the alleged chemical attack, however even the four page documentation presentation which was released seemed rather childish, unprofessional.
Its pretty clear some in the Western Mainstream News Outlets are seeming to desperate to get what they want and that is another war which would based
on Lies. As it was with Iraq. The short Washington Post article citing the Human Right Watch map is a great example of how desperate they are
Ghouta CW Reported on Aug 20 Pro Rebel Facebook Page
While the Majority of the News Media have proclaimed the Attack on Ghouta occurred on August 21 there is an interesting rebel facebook page suggesting
otherwise a different date.
August 20. Look at the date, time.
SAMS (Syrian American Medical Society)
August 20 at
Confirmed chemical weapon attack in east Damascus Ghuta Many killed and many affected Confirmed from field hospitals doctors
I heard the UN investigators were in Syria...if that's true I hope they can find their way there...wishful thinking, I know.
What a strange of an coincidence wouldn't you agree? if the Syrian Arab Army were behind the alleged attack, why then has a rebel facebook page
reported the chemical just a day before it supposedly occurred?
Seems to me we are being misled by our leaders yet again. They are trying to fool us into supporting a war based on lies and more lies. If the attack
occurred on August 20 then its clear whom was behind it.
edit on 18-9-2013 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)