No one really knows what to think of the whole package, which is a collection of the most hideous abstract arrangements that the human eye has
perused so far. No one also fully understands what has been going on, even though "top people" have been allegedly working on it. But whenever their
opinion leans toward the possibility of intercepting just an incredible set of coincidences, the axe goes down again. Here are the synopsis of the
Imagine an acronym with a numerical assignment attached to it, such as
Does the above expression make sense?
There seems to be no problem with he alphabetical part - USA - because it has been commonly used to short the name of a country; that is, the United
States of America. But what about that number 13?
If you ask the question why don't we see the option where 13 starts the expression, that means
you are under way to provide a plausible explanation to the initial question. In the former case, "USA 13," the number is positioned right after
letter A, which starts
the alphabet. Put a mental accent on the words "start" and "USA" and refresh your civics, if you are an American.
The original 13 states forming the "United States of America" were established by the Articles of Confederation, ratified on March 1, 1781.
The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments.
The need for a stronger federal government soon became apparent and eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The present United States
Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation on March 4, 1789.
So that wasn't that difficult test for any naturalized American citizen and hopefully for many Americans as well. So let's proceed to the next
There is no way not to notice that the letters U, S, and A have been reorganized to form AUS . That reorganization obviously affected the original
number 13 that changed into 5. But why did 13 changed into this particular number?
This couldn't be really solved without a clue.
USA 13 (September 16)
AUS 5 (September 17)
Isn't it peculiar that the next expression "AUS 5" comes the next day after September 16?
But even with the date clue, the second arrangement hardly make any sense; that is, if we are in the year 2012 or before. But this year, the light
goes on . . .
U[nited]S[states of]A[merica] 13 (September 16)
AUS[tria] 5 (September 17)
Since USA and AUS are similar expressions (identical letters differently organized), the events occurring should be similar as well - they were two
cases of mass shooting.
Now wait a minute. We know that the incidences of mass shooting are unfortunately on the rise, especially in the USA, so the probability of this
occurrence taking place worldwide on two subsequent days is hardly astronomical. But there is the limiting option; the AUS - which are the first three
letters of "Austria". AUS are three initial letters, so are to the three initial letters of the "United States of America." And both groupings are
made of the same letters A, S, and U!
Here comes a bit difficult part. If someone accepts the idea that the above coincidental arrangement may not be a coincidence, then such a person
should accept a possibility that in both cases, something made two guys on the opposite sides of the Atlantic to go and shoot other people a day
apart. And such a possibility is a way too strong coffee for many people to drink. Moreover, that invisible killer is probably attempting to inform us
that he-she-it has the technical know how to force us to do something that we wouldn't normally do by choosing the circumstances of the crimes in
such a way that the related data would form a set of very strange coincidences. Here is how that invisible killer proceeded to reinforce its case.
Look at this arrangement:
ABC = DEF
That's likely false, as opposed to ABC=ABC. The only possibility for ABC=DEF to become a true statement is when a condition is added, such as
ABC = DEF (3 letters =3 letters)
It follows that the alphabetical arrangement in question must be "more truthful."
USA = AUS ( 3 letters = 3 letters; and U=U, S=S, A=A)
It also follows we wouldn't have now much problem with the interpretation of this arrangement.
USA, AUS 33
The numerical assignment 33 doesn't seem to be random given the fact that "USA" is a collection of 3 letters and so is "AUS." It should be
written as USA 3, AUS 3; but even as it stands above, the arrangement is hardly confusing.
The next logical step involves a piece of legitimate math, the way we know it.
USA, AUS 33 = x + y
There is really no unique solution to standalone equation 33=x+y, but given the overall circumstances according to which the equation is solved, there
are two special solutions:
1) USA, AUS 33 = 16 + 17
where 16 and 17 mean the subsequent days of the month when the mass shooting took place.
2) USA, AUS 33 = 20 + 13
where 20 and 13 means "twenty-thirteen" or 2013 - the current year.
Of course, the invisible killer wouldn't forget to mention the month of the shootings; the 9th month of the year. Yes, you guessed it right. That...
whatever it is simply split the number 33 with "x" - the sign for a multiplication.
33 ---> 3 x 3 = 9 = "September"
Since that "thing" knows that there was, is, and will not be a human mathematical genius who could enumerate in a rigorous manner the above
arrangements in such a way as to answer the question of coincidence or not coincidence (and therefore intent), it will symbolically point toward an
entity who is said to be capable of doing math like that. That comes after an expected brief : So we have 18 people dead . . .
But that's not how an "intelligent computer" would put it. Instead, it would make this emotionless statement,
13 + 5 = 18
and then it would open the Bible.
I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.
That's how God describes himself in Revelation. But man bestowed upon him a bunch of superlatives including omniscience. That means God knows
everything and so he should identify the invisible killer. Since the passage puts heavy accent on the opposites ("the First and the Last..."),
let's put the accent on the first and the last terms of the summary expression as well.
+ 5 = 18
There are a few statements in the Bible that are indexed under Chapter 13 and Verse 18, but it wouldn't be a mistake at all to consider the "bad
This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666.
Well, we have surely gained some insight into the secret works, so let's follow the instruction and "calculate" the number of the beast with
respect to those 18 unfortunate individuals who lost their lives in the USA and Austria within two subsequent days under very suspicious, albeit
18 = 6 + 6 + 6
It looks like we have a symbolic ID of the invisible killer. It's the Biblical devil. But who or what is hiding behind that Biblical figure?