I had no idea where to put this so I posted here. Feel free to move Mods if necessary.
Ever since November 2012, just two months after the discovery of Comet ISON, a physicist named James McCanney began referring to the comet as “The
Red Comet of Death.” What does this mean? He refers back to the Ten Plagues of Egypt claiming that the plagues were actually caused by a comet that
passed bringing about the plagues to the Earth that eventually caused the Egyptian Pharaoh, possibly Ramses II, to free the Israelites creating the
biblical story of the Exodus.
McCanney has some theories about comets that totally differ from main stream science and NASA for that matter, which has caused him to become somewhat
of a maverick. For 30 years he has proposed a theory about comets being electric, and that they may increase in size to form planets.
First some history on the theory;
To find out about the electric comet hypothesis of McCanney and others such as Ralph Juergens just several years prior to McCanney, read this
The True Origins of the Electric Comet Theory
Here is the hypothesis of Jeurgens and others who agree with the theory;
"As a comet accelerates toward the Sun and electrons are stripped from the comet's surface, it first develops a huge visible glow discharge, or
coma, then the discharge switches to the arc mode. This results in a number of bright cathode 'spots' of high current density on the surface,
etching circular craters and burning the surface black, giving the surface its extreme darkness. Each arc forms a 'cathode jet' that electrically
accelerates the excavated and vaporized material into space."
Although the article describes the origins of Electric Comet Theory, it was McCanney who presented the idea that the comet nuclei ACCRETES as it races
towards the sun. From the article;
It was McCanney's hypothesis that cometary nuclei ACCRETE material, and that this accretion process, continuing over long periods of time, would
give rise to a PLANET. In contrast to this model, Thornhill's hypothesis predicts the progressive DEGRADATION of comet nuclei, with sharply defined
surface features from the electrical etching process. This distinction between the two models amounts to an ACID TEST.
In his article, "The Nature of and Origins of Comets and the Evolution of Celestial Bodies (Part 1), Kronos, Vol. 9, No. 1, Fall 1983, McCanney
writes, "...a comet involved in the discharge of the solar capacitor will continue to grow in size and mass...."
"Curved tails, such as in Donati's comet, when it neared the Sun, are a result of the matter in the Zodiacal disk falling into the comet
"This causes a buildup of material on the asteroidal comet nucleus....Comets eventually evolve into planets...."
It was this theory that put him on the outs with astronomers and NASA.
McCanney associates many of the strange weather events and phenomena that I have been writing about to the approaching Comet ISON. He suggests that we
are in for a helluva ride, especially when we pass through the comet’s tail in January of 2014.
Basically, what is being presented here is that Comet ISON will interact, or has already begun to interact, with our sun and the interplanetary
bodies. McCanney says that the comet is very large and that NASA is downplaying it as a “dirty snowball.” He also says that it has at least one
companion and possibly up to 7 which would mean these companions are orbiting the comet and that the comet has a gravitational pull.
When something like this happens, one has to be very cautious, but after examining the data that I have seen, I would say that it appears to be
real. Furthermore one of the possible companions appears to be at about two lunar distances (half a million miles) and has not formed a coma for some
odd reason. If the object is orbiting the nucleus of the comet at that distance it implies that the nucleus of this comet is possibly as big or bigger
From James McCanney on the Celestial Convergence website;
He says that NASA tries to minimize the comet nuclei to almost nothing and has done so with this particular comet as well, but he disagrees. They
downplay it as small, but McCanney believes it is a large comet.
Back to my original intro to this thread; he suggests that this comet may be “The Red Comet of Death” that may have been the same comet that
caused the Ten Plagues of Egypt. After I read this I started doing some google searches. I am only slightly familiar with the biblical story of the
Exodus, so I had to do some reading up on it. One thing I found is that Jews believe the Passover Holiday, which they celebrate every year
commemorating Moses leading them to freedom from the Pharaoh of Egypt. As I read some sites with information about this, the non-Jewish authors would
claim that it isn’t known when these plagues occurred if they occurred at all, but then I read one article written by a Jew and it said the year was
Here’s where things got interesting for me. Not too long ago I read an article that suggested the Black Plague was brought about by a comet. People
of the day wrote about a great comet that came in 1347, exactly 666 years ago. And we all know about the Great Comet of 1680, exactly 333 years ago.
Could Comet ISON be the same comet returning every 333 years? If this is the case and you go back ten of these possible cycles, 3,333 years ago, you
come to just 7 years off from the date of 1312 BCE. That’s very close. When you put it into perspective, all of these plagues would have taken some
time to manifest, and then the Israelites had to pass through the dessert. By the time they would have settled the Canaan, it would make sense that
seven years would have passed.
McCanney claims that a great comet came along back then and caused the Ten Plagues of Egypt, just as some speculated that the comet of 1347 caused the
Black Plague that killed a quarter of Europe’s population. I tried to do a search for any major events that may have occurred during the early
1680’s after that comet, but found nothing.
According to this article there is a document in a museum written about a thousand years after the Egyptian Plagues that references terrible events in
The Ten Plagues of Egypt
Although written 1,000 years after the plagues would have taken place, the Ipuwer papyrus is an authentic Egyptian document -- and it does
describe a series of events that bear a marked resemblance to the biblical plagues: "Lo, the river is blood. As one drinks of it one shrinks from the
people. And thirsts for water . . . Lo, all beasts, their hearts shall weep. Cattle bemoan the state of the land . . . Plague is throughout the land.
Blood is everywhere . . . Trees are destroyed. No fruit nore herbs are found . . . Lo, the desert claims the land . . . Those who shelter are in the
dark of the storm."
What were the ten plagues? First through ten were water turning to blood, frogs, lice, flies, livestock disease, boils, thunder and hail, locusts,
three days of darkness and then the death of all firstborn children, excluding the Israelites.
You have to admit, it is quite a coincidence.
To be continued...