I believe Assad should keep at least half of his chemical weapons, because if he doesn’t, he is going to be accused, and then treated by America in
almost exactly the same way as if he had got rid of them completely. This is just one of Iraq’s many lessons that: False accusation can be made, and
then acted on as if they were real.
Exactly the same media “reporting” is being used as in 2003 Iraq, including the non-reporting of inconvenient news….
1. On where chemical weapons are coming from
2. On scientific evidence of who used chemical weapons
Samples taken at the Syrian town where chemical weapons were allegedly used indicate that it was rebels - not the Syrian army - behind the
attack, Russia’s UN envoy Vitaly Churkin has said.
“It was determined that on March 19 the rebels fired an unguided missile Bashair-3 at the town of Khan al-Assal, which has been under government
control. The results of the analysis clearly show that the shell used in Khan al-Assal was not factory made and that it contained sarin,” he said.
Churkin added that the contents of the shell “didn’t contain chemical stabilizers in the toxic substance,”and therefore “is not a standard
chemical charge.” The RDX - an explosive nitroamine commonly used for industrial and military applications - found in the warhead was not
consistent with what the armed forces use. rt.com...
3. And Misused Intelligence
Despite the Obama administration’s supposedly “high confidence” regarding Syrian government guilt over the Aug. 21 chemical attack near
Damascus, a dozen former U.S. military and intelligence officials are telling President Obama that they are picking up information that undercuts the
Official Story. www.washingtonsblog.com...
Rather than broadcast the fact that (at the very least) both sides have used chemical weapons, we hear that just the Assad side has.
Rather than broadcast the opinion that it would be madness for Assad to have consciously ordered the U.S of chemical weapons, we hear (time and again)
the opinion (and it really is only an opinion given we’re not being shown the evidence) that whatever evidence there is, is undeniable.
Last year: The BBC even pulled a news story that showed the rebels tricking a prisoner of war, into becoming an unwilling, and unwitting, suicide
For western media to be repeat Iraq’s 2003 media propaganda, is to give literal meaning to Obama’s campaign phrase “yes we can!”
And he can because there is no law against it (as Bush & Blair both being filthy rich, free men, confirms). They’re free because although what they
did is a moral crime, it certainly wasn’t a crime legally (so be it, mostly thanks to them obtaining UN Resolution 1441).
The fact neither the U.N or Congress will approve military action is why Obama looks weak –not because of Putin’s mater diplomacy as the Western
media would have you focus on.
The Real Truth About Syria…
America has only recently www.timesofisrael.com...
started (effectively) arming the ideology that
(apparently) did 9/11, because Syria’s opposition have made little progress into territories who’s people sincerely wish to be led by President
Assad, and also because Obama has (long) been under immense political pressure to send weapons to the rebels.
In a way that political pressure, makes Obama’s America, a victim of propaganda found politically favourable by those advocating “Humanitarian
Bombing” within Syria –it’s a media message which basically says: “Syrian opposition are fighting for freedom & democracy, against a
government composed of evil people, headed by a tyrannical despot.”
How Chemical Weapons Have Limited Our War Efforts…
The biggest reason why the opposition hasn’t already received all the weapons, and all the finance required, to overthrow Assad (as of about 2 years
ago) is because regime collapse for Assad, also means chemical weapons falling into the hands of up to 30 groups. I’m not saying there’s a risk of
chemical weapons literally falling into the hands of 30+ groups (more like 10-20% of that number -depending on whatever battlefield geography may
exist at the time). But it’s a no-brainer regime collapse would see WMD’s falling into the hands of jihadists since discipline (including even
ideological discipline) within the Syrian opposition, isn’t exactly strong.
And yet conventional weapons are now being sent to Syria’s opposition. These weapons, paid for by American taxes (from a population relatively
generous in world terms, for donating towards charity) are not being given to the Syrian opposition because Obama possesses a large heart, that aches
for the 100,000 plus, Syrians killed (so far).
If this were true, then the Whitehouse would have sought to quickly end
the war in one of two ways…
1. By giving weapons in abundance to Syria’s opposition (despite the risk of WMD’s falling to terrorists).
2. Or to end the war by not arming the opposition, and obstructing them, because the WMD risk means they are not fit to run Syria, and therefore it
would be in the Syrian’s people’s interest for the conflict to not happen –at least until they have formed a better run opposition.
3. The option Obama is choosing is to weakly arm Syrian opposition, in the knowledge this will maximise the conflicts bloodiness & duration. Totally
foreseeable because Russia has made a geopolitical point, of arming Assad, whilst covertly threating to consciously neutralise American aid efforts
(if the Kremlin judges necessarily).
President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday revealed Russia had suspended deliveries of sophisticated S-300
missile systems to Syria even though some components had already been handed over.
Why We Arm…
MOSCOW: Russia could expand arms sales to Iran and revise the terms of U.S. military transit to Afghanistan if Washington launches a strike on
Syria, a senior Russian lawmaker said Wednesday.
So the biggest reason why Obama assists Syria’s opposition is because not only does Obama (the politician) not care a lot about Syrian suffering,
but because (those advising him prominently) wish to further degrade the Syrian population’s living standards, in order to further degrade Syria’s
regional power as a sovereign state.
There are strong motivations for wanting this outcome: Syria is: An ally of Iran, Russia, and China.
Syria has almost always been this way, and under Assad (or if after Assad’s death; Syria remains under Assad’s Shiite dominated, political
ideology) it would most likely to continue being an ally of the said, and so not a very co-operative place towards Western economic, and military
America (a strongly Christian country) is financing weapons to people we know donate & share weapons with those who will happily convert others to
Islam, at gunpoint. Who proudly use suicide bombings, and who’s ideological “philosophers” (somewhat idly) fantasise over not merely destroying
Israel, but also all the Western world too. In short we directly supply weapons to people who really are benefactors our enemy.
But when you look at 9/11 see how 15 of the 19 hijackers came from 1.76% of the world’s Muslims (Saudi Arabia), and then discover its unsurprising
these hijackers sincerely believed killing 3000 civilians was a morally good thing to do, because their values are from a country which: Still has a
secret police, gives homosexuals the death penalty
A British man was arrested and beaten in Saudi Arabia by religious police when they discovered he was gay.
Stephen Comiskey, a 36-year-old nurse, was threatened with beheading and thrown in a cell, the Sun reports.
He says he was tricked by religious police who sent him a text message pretending to be a friend. Homosexuality is a capital offence in Saudi Arabia.
Saudi seven face crucifixion and firing squad for armed robbery
One of group to be executed, speaking from cell on smuggled phone, says most of ring were juveniles at time of thefts
Bans all women from driving, and teaches religious
extremism in schools…
Anti-Western and Extremist Views Pervade Saudi www.nytimes.com...
And then discover how 12 years after 9/11 not only Saudi Arabia not been “regime changed” but it’s not even
been given an ultimatum of
regime change unless it substantially improve the barbaric & evil laws, that quite unsurprisingly produces a society produces terrorists who’s
personal beliefs sincerely represent the society they come from.
That Alone Tells You…
The “war on terror” is a complete sham (fantasy) and it’s no wonder then, why America so readily, goes about effectively arming Al Qaeda
(especially when the objective is bringing about the degradation of Syria as an enemy territory!).
It’s no surprise there was a delay in arming the rebels when chemical weapons might fall to the Islamists equivalent of EBay, or when giving the
rebels a lot of support would have entailed ending the conflict early -something that would save Syria from this conflicts full potential to degrade
Syria as sovereign power (regional actor).
None of our policy has anything to do with human rights!!! Instead concern over “Human Rights” is merely a useful propaganda concept, for sending
people (both allied & enemy) to their graves. It’s useful for avenging Russia over e.g. Syria (by degrading their image) when they pass a law
prohibiting the promotion of homosexuality to under 18’s (whilst our cars simultaneously fill-up on oil purchased from homosexual crucifiers). This
is the reality of our policy: Smoke & mirrors, to screen people without a gram of human compassion, and to more importantly utilise the populations
sincerely held human right compassion, to support wars, for reasons that are not even the government’s sincere concerns –let alone real foreign