It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ariel school Africa UFO kids interview
Yes, that is certainly one of the most interesting UFO sighting cases out there, but I'm not sure why it has anything to do with what we are discussing here. And I highly doubt that UFO operate on acoustics anyway because there is no air in space. If the UFO did make a noise which sounded like a flute, it was most likely doing so in order to attract the attention of the children. The vast majority of credible UFO witnesses describe the UFO as being completely silent, so you may want to rethink your position on acoustics.
If your into watching the first 30 minutes of things, watch this:
It has been passed around here before, Thrive Documentary
I watched the whole lecture by Nassim, I'm just saying the first 30 mins were hard to watch. And of course I've seen Thrive, it's really just child's play, and it also has nothing to do with what we are discussing here. It's a good watch, but all it does it make claims about the torus and ancient symbols, but never actually provides any technical details about how we could exploit the torus shape for anything. There are many free energy documentaries which are a much better than Thrive.
reply to post by will2learn
Whilst I understand why you do not like the 'braid' model as you put it and think there are unlimited configurations, there are likely only very limited numbers of ways that these quanta of space can be packed together to be stable.
I don't dislike it, I think it's a brilliant theory and I definitely think that something close to it is the truth. But the more I think about it, the more it seems like it's not a 100% correct theory. I think it's very close to the truth but not quite all the way there. For example, why is it that the standing waves produced by electrons around the nuclei produce shapes which correspond to spherical harmonics? Can you fully explain such abstract behavior of fundamental particles using only the braid theory?
My personal theory is that space can be stretched into a so called "negative dimension" (creating negative energy), which cannot be detected from within our own dimension. The basic idea is that energy can only be created if an equal amount of negative energy is also created. So we really only get to see one side of the big bang, in negative space there should have been a negative big bang. I really don't want to get too much into this concept in this thread but you can read more about that theory here.
I also want to share the following video because it's super cool and related to the subjects I have brought up in this post (spherical harmonics in particular) and near the end it shows something which I think is starting to get extremely close to the way subatomic particles are structured and the way they oscillate, and it's something which cannot be fully explained by braids imo. However, while I believe that both these concepts are getting very close to the truth, they are not entirely compatible. We need something which can merge the best of all these theories.
EDIT: to quote top comment from the video:
Tetrahedral non-euclidean geometry was my specialty... it is how spherical harmonics work, for buckyballs as well as hydrogen atoms... you are really on to something here... when you say "is this how atomic oscillations work", they're called "spherical harmonics" and yes, they work almost exactly how you have shown them... bravo, you deserve the nobel for thisedit on 16/9/2013 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)
No energy cannot be destroyed, if there is energy here now, where would it go if destroyed?
Nothing to do with this thread?
You brought it up!