reply to post by TheMagus
water vapor? wat chu talkin' 'bout willis?
since when have planes used LOX as fuel?
to claim it is water vapor is mendacious, to say the least
certainly not one of your better posts...
but feel free to disregard my words, as I Am quite "Insane".
That bit of garbage may not indicate mendacity on your part, or even insanity, but it sure as Hell highlights your ignorance regarding combustion
Why do you feel liquid oxygen is necessary for combustion to produce water vapor?
edit on 345America/Chicago9RAmerica/Chicago2013-09-16T02:17:06-05:00Mondayu06America/Chicago by BenReclused because: Typo
If you truly believe jet engine exhaust is just
water vapor, you are trolling
see gauls post which confirms that jets do not
emit white fluffy clouds
I Note, a rarity indeed, you've had to edit your post, looks like you've boxed yourself in there
regarding "ignorance of the combustion process".
then again association with cults ,especially those that obnoxiously project, does have a mind-numbing effect.
what a pity, as I was a "fan" of your posts, alas, no longer [feet of clay and whatnot ]
as for the rest of the "Sane Clown Posse": like a creeping rot afflicting your brains
your very "sane" need to "debunk" has led you all to make fools of yourselves
by claiming, falsely, that my post was in regards to clouds, either that, or the koolaids of scientism
and "expert" worship have reduced you to confusion.
that's when you're not punching the alert button when you need a mod to delete/cover up inconvenient truths
[such as proof of the worthlessness of some of your pet sources ]
in attempting to refute my refutation of contrails NOT being just "white fluffy clouds" you've actually confirmed it. No hydrocarbon burning
process produces "clean pure water vapor", but if you believe that,
you'll believe anything
doesn't take much to rattle your cages does it?
this is yet another meme you're spreading and just reveals your duplicitous nature
then again there is the disgusting practice of Polluting
via dumping urine and fecal matter from the plane's toilet onto those below, so if
if it craps like a duck...
alas, I see the OP has been assimilated in the borg consciousness
so I'll be moving on, I'll just leave you all this instructional quote, as I can only concern Myself with the living as opposed to the dead...
"Debunked" is very absolute. (Yes, I know "Very absolute" is redundant and unnecessary since absolute is all "boolean".)
In my mind, anyone who considers any topic "debunked" without knowing ABSOLUTELY every piece of evidence and having first-hand knowledge of the
concept is debunked in the head.
In fact, I hereby sue for discontinuation (and cessation of all uses of) the term debunked. It is needless and it is rarely, if ever, used
In order to correctly debunk something, you must first thoroughly discredit every facet of the idea, and render it unusable, even in modified form in
conjunction with any other concept, ever, in the entire future of the universe, anywhere, and everywhere, no matter what, double-sealed and stamped,
and no returnsies.
So no. It's not debunked. Show me an unbroken fossil record. Show me a family tree traced back to infinity. Show me the lack of any civilization
in the universe which is now or ever has been capable of space flight, benevolent intervention, malevolent intervention, genetic manipulation, and the
occasional levitation of rocks, and I'll give you your "debunked". However, anything short of outright refuting of all of those points will
constitute "not debunked".
You stand to win 8 letters. I demand a universe of knowledge in return...