It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
americanthinker.com...
From Wellesley she went to Yale law school after which she moved to Washington, D.C. to take a job with the House Judiciary Committee investigating Watergate. She was fired from her job and from that point on distinguished herself as a public master of mendacity.
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of the 27-year-old, fired her, and has explained why:
"Because she was a liar," Zeifman said in an interview last week. "She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality."
At about the same time, Hillary failed the District of Columbia bar exam, hardly one of the more difficult bar exams in the country. What difference does it make? I realize that many voters have uncritically adopted Bill Clinton's description of her as "the smartest woman in the world", but except at deceit, self-promotion, and self-enrichment she is a repeat, proven failure whenever tested.
In 1978 she turned a $1,000 cattle commodity trading account into $6,300 overnight and within 10 months into a $100,000 profit. While she first lied and claimed she learned how to make this incredible investment profit in the riskiest of endeavors by educating herself on commodity futures, in fact she was the beneficiary of preferred treatment by an Arkansan when her husband was Arkansas attorney general and slated to become that state's governor, when in other words Bill was a person in a position to provide favors in return.
From the beginning of the Whitewater controversy, Hillary Clinton has maintained a public posture seemingly at odds with her actions. She was reluctant to release records during the 1992 campaign. She fought David Gergen's recommendation to turn over all the records in 1993. She led White House opposition to the appointment of a special counsel in early 1994.
To think that she has a chance of winning the 2016 election gives me shivers up my spine. The lady is very dangerous and has sold out America for the interests of Saudi Arabia.
rnaa
American Thinker is a cesspool of full of insane inanities.
That is not opinion; it is fact. It is one of the ugliest of the uglies.
More than enough said.
Please, enlighten me with why AT is so horrible
and by all means tell me why I should vote for Hillary.
xuenchen
reply to post by Erica1631
To think that she has a chance of winning the 2016 election gives me shivers up my spine. The lady is very dangerous and has sold out America for the interests of Saudi Arabia.
"Dangerous" in Capital Letters !!!
She is the property of Globalist NWO interests and Agenda 21.
Chrisfishenstein
xuenchen
reply to post by Erica1631
To think that she has a chance of winning the 2016 election gives me shivers up my spine. The lady is very dangerous and has sold out America for the interests of Saudi Arabia.
"Dangerous" in Capital Letters !!!
She is the property of Globalist NWO interests and Agenda 21.
Oh yeah, none of our past presidents weren't anything along these lines, huh??
We will all be dancing to the same puppet masters come 2016 that have been in control since the beginning, but people care too much about that one PERSON....It has nothing to do with that one person!!
It will probably never sink in for most of you, not only that your vote doesn't matter, but the names change and nothing else does!!
If every person in the USA stayed home and didn't vote, we would still have a winner I can assure you!
All of what you said is your opinion, nothing about what is untrue in the article that got you on such a rant.
Def Youth
When did ATS become a site for Republican shills? It's starting to smell like the Yahoo comments section around here.