reply to post by totallackey
Fair enough on that...but as long as there are things we see happening over our heads that don't lend themselves to easy explanation?
Everyone posting on these threads, proponents (for the existence of chemtrails) and opponents (against the existence of chemtrails) see things
happening over their heads. The proponents claim these things do not "lend themselves to easy explanation," despite the easy to understand science
posted as an explantion.
As long as there would be reason and motive to want to manipulate weather? As long as the technology to do it exists..just like a chemtrail
would look like, if that is what it was?
What does a chemtrail look like? A persistent contrail? Is there some other distinguishing characteristic we, the opponents, are missing? Some
explanation that has somehow eluded us?
Well, then it seems a fair topic to ponder in general terms anyway, and calling it a myth is assuming other evidence not a part of the debate
so far. Explanation of what some people do see, for starters.
I call it a myth because EVERY SINGLE EXPLANATION ever offered by a proponent on EVERY SINGLE CHEMTRAIL THREAD has been the same ignorant explanation
OVER AND OVER AGAIN...
If there is additional evidence offered for the existence of chemtrails, I have yet to find it.
Now weather is just one offered explanation of chemtrails, as it seems the attack is on the whole concept itself here. I'd personally say
screwing with weather is the most likely reason (assuming a lot to say it's all as it seems anyway), and viable for the means and motive...to look at
The science states the jet engine exhaust is caused by the atmospheric conditions. This is undeniable. Does the exhaust have a net affect on climate?
The science is still out...
I really wonder why tho....when ATS has a whole forum dedicated to this and this forum isn't in the hoax bin, debunking the WHOLE
concept, as a viable thing itself, seems the focus? Why not explaining what people are really seeing happen? (and...I have been out looking for
explanations to some of what I've seen ..it isn't in the top 10 of Google ..or top 100 for that matter... Perhaps a future science course I take may
explain it in 'collegese' from a $500 book..lol)
The forum title is GEO-ENGINEERING AND CHEMTRAILS. I do not know why the site owners choose to keep the CHEMTRAIL portion of the title.
As I stated above, we are all seeing the EXACT SAME thing above our heads. I, for one, am unable to determine the chemical make up of jet exhaust
simply by looking at it...
On the other hand, there have been numerous posts offered, CLEARLY explaining WHAT contrails are, HOW they form, WHY they form, WHEN they form, WHERE
they form, and WHO forms them...AND, the SCIENCE behind the WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, HOW, and WHY, is INDISPUTABLE!!! If this was a court of law, THE
CASE WOULD BE CLOSED, ON THIS BASIS ALONE!
* I'd also note ..Seeding clouds by dropping chemicals into the atmosphere with aircraft was how the U.S. did it in the 70's experiments
where Chemtrails, visible or not, were quite literally the point of the effort and the outcome desired. (
Utah's experience with cloud seeding ) If it's still happening? That's just
it. It's still happening as a highly refined process starting long ago in an open failure, not a new idea. That makes it more likely as a
possible explanation, IMO.
I also noted that cloud seeding is not the same thing as contrails. Cloud seeding does not take place at the same altitude as contrail formation.
As I have offered TIME AND TIME AGAIN, if anyone has ANY ACTUAL EVIDENCE of the existence of CHEMTRAILS, all they need do is contact
A crime is being actively committed if chemtrails exist.