It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Syria crisis: US 'to drop military threat'
Fighting is continuing in Syria despite the talks in Geneva
The US will drop its insistence that a UN resolution on Syria must be backed by military force, officials say, after strong objections from Russia.
US and Russian diplomats say the two sides are edging closer to a deal on Syria's chemical arsenal, as talks in Geneva enter a third day.
They are thrashing out the technical details of the disarmament process.
But a major point of contention is reported to be the US insistence that any deal on chemical weapons be enshrined in a UN resolution, backed by the threat of military force for non-compliance.
The Russians had objected to any threat of force, and to any resolution that would blame the Assad regime for the Damascus poison-gas attack.
White House officials have now briefed reporters that the US is willing to drop its position on the use of force.
And the US side has now begun to talk only of unspecified consequences for non-compliance
jdub297
I remember when "American values" included opposition to genocide and despots, and negotiating ftom positions of strength.
jdub297
Any sense that (former) American values will ever count for anything in the region as we abandon leadership on the world stage
Cobaltic1978
Doesn't it actually state in your constitution that the U.S would not become involved in wars that do not directly involve them?
I appreciate that accords have been signed and alliances forged, but really if the U.S were to become embroiled in any combat situation relating to Syria, then it would go against the constituion.
Does Syria have the capability to launch a strike on the U.S?
Unless U.S interests are compromised, then they should leave well alone.
butcherguy
reply to post by jdub297
I like the fact that (at least it would appear to be fact) that we are not going to strike Syria.
I intensely dislike the fact (indisputable) that we were brought to this point by a pair of bumbling fools that have made the US appear to be weak.
Foreign Policy? What Foreign Policy????
jdub297
reply to post by Alfa1
Onviously, none of you have much pride or knowledge of American history.
This is what you will live with through fear, indifference and a lack of pride in "American values."
buster2010
How nice that you complain about Assad killing his people but say nothing about the FSA doing the same thing. In this case Assad is the lesser of two evils. Who would want WMD's in the hands of people who eat the organs of their victims? And what happens in Syria is none of Americas business if other nations in the ME has problems with Syria then they can man up and deal with their own problems.
If America is not to be the indispensable nation any longer, as President Obama has signaled, and if liberal internationalism is in decline, who and what will substitute for American leadership on this vast array of global challenges?
alfa1
jdub297
reply to post by Alfa1
Onviously, none of you have much pride or knowledge of American history.
This is what you will live with through fear, indifference and a lack of pride in "American values."
No particular reason why I should have pride in American anything.
I'm not American.
Weird how a lot of Americans on the internet somehow just assume that of everybody.
I think that Obama has played a bad hand very well.