posted on Sep, 14 2013 @ 02:32 AM
reply to post by GrantedBail
He's saying the same thing that article says I think you must have misunderstood him. He already knows we are trying to take out Assad using the
rebels. Maybe you think that's a good idea? I don't think that's a good idea at all.
It's quite transparent that we were never after chemical weapons to stop Assad from using them on civilians. This was an excuse at first to go in and
attack, but then there was no support and Russia moved in. Russia then played his hand. Now the story had to change because they couldn't admit that
they still wanted to attack Assad to bring about regime change. America thought hmm well let's get those weapons out first and then strike, and that
way Israel won't be breathing in Sarin gas in retaliation.
Russia saw this and said the deal only goes forward if US promises no strike. Now America doesn't get what it wants (still wants the chemicals gone
for retaliation potential), but it doesn't get to strike Syria as of now. So what do they come out with? US says they will further support for the
rebels with new weapons..
The End game is taking out Assad it always was. The mind games continue. I don't know the next move, but I hope they follow the script as put forth
in your op. I have hope for that.