posted on Oct, 9 2013 @ 08:43 AM
For those entering the 9/11-discussion lately, and willing to put a lot of time and effort in educating yourself by means of either neutral and/or
biased information, this next website is THE real treasure trove of the whole INTERNET regarding 9/11 :
It is also a great assistant for longstanding 9/11 researchers. You will find a LOT you probably never saw before...!
This is the interesting
at the end of the Book part of this author's HUGE scientific and non-scientific links website.
All in all he concludes that both sides of the 9/11-discussion participants are all making huge mistakes during the last decade, in interpreting the
available visual record of the 3 collapses.
Direct measurements extracted from the visual record of the collapses grossly contradict history as it is generally presented. A record of
measurements and documented observables of all 3 collapsed buildings on a level far more intricate than that which previously existed has been
presented. The record is verifiable superior to and grossly contradicted by the record provided by U.S. Government agencies.
In reality there is no scientific approach and, therefore, no technical history of the collapses at all. This is a verifiable statement.
I do agree with him, wholeheartedly. There are many, seemingly straight thinking, so called 9/11-research experts, from both isles of the discussion,
that hold on to certain conclusions that are based on totally misinterpreted visual records.
The real craziest example is the use of the term "free fall" for all 3 towers their full collapse times. Which is of course a prime example of lazy
research or lack of skill yet.
WTC 7 has a 2.5 seconds period of proven free fall time, and WTC 1 (the radio mast one) its upper block destruction shows a straight-angled fall graph
during a bit more than a second, indicating no resistance from the still standing tower part under it. It crumbled in on itself, all easily to check
yourself when you understand the physics laws involved and the way they were graphically used by the researchers pointing us to this utterly strange
All to be found in the above 9/11 research compilation website.