It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
westcoast
reply to post by Dianec
I think the key issue here, is that while it wouldn't really be necessarily a major deal, were it detected, most people don't realize that.
It seems to be the heralding call to doom and gloom, so I believe that is why TA wants to avoid discussing it.
kezzy24
no offence ta but seismologists and those that are learning seismology must be aware that our planet changes the norm and gives us more mystery s as we learn and no self respecting seismologist would risk feeling relaxed as with tectonic shifts and volcanic tremors can mean anything really a volcano that shows every sign of eruption can suddenly go quiet and stop where as volcanoes with little signs can suddenly erupt its like mount st helens where volcanologist thought it would be a normal eruption didnt put the exclusion zone far enough so several people died or there was a case a volcano had no volcanic signs so a volcanologist took his students up the volcano and out of 16 people only the professor managed to survive and ive been studying volcanos and earthquakes since i was little as i was so interested on everything pompeii and how earth science could be used to describe the disaster in a different view
TrueAmerican
westcoast
reply to post by Dianec
I think the key issue here, is that while it wouldn't really be necessarily a major deal, were it detected, most people don't realize that.
It seems to be the heralding call to doom and gloom, so I believe that is why TA wants to avoid discussing it.
Well I'd be happy to discuss harmonic tremor or volcanic tremor if either were present at YS, but they are not. The signatures at YMR are vehicle signatures, and I see them all the time. Every day. Just tired of pointing it out. Understand the seismic monitoring, where it is positioned, the likely propagation of various signals, and you too will see this for yourself.
Sageturkey is making the same mistakes I used to long ago. Yes, the signals appear similar to the USGS examples, but that happens all the time- there are lots of signals that appear similar. But now I have better tools, and easily avoid them. I put in my time. I studied hard. I made contacts. I acquired the tools. Because I was sick of not knowing the truth, and trying to rely on hearsay from doomists. Yeah, I might still be a doomist to a degree, but I try to balance that with solid information I can depend on. I did this so as to form a reliable buffer between us and scientists, who otherwise get pelted with trivial questions left and right from us. They get tired of answering them too, when they have already put the information out there, and most people are just too lazy to seek it out and learn for themselves.
So now speaking to all of you, not just westcoast- don't be "most people," and learn yourself, or simply ask one of us that has put in more time, and has acquired better tools. Once you study hard enough, you are then able to ask and phrase questions in such a knowledgeable way that will elicit responses from scientists, instead of no response at all. And even then, I still screw up (remember when I freaked over the waves from the 9+ in Japan being received at YS?) I just screw up a lot less, because of experience. There are so many things that register on extremely sensitive seismometers that deciphering through them really does require better tools- if you are going to do it quickly- and even then, some signatures at the edges of seismic station coverage can be extremely difficult to diagnose. And when we are talking a volcano as large as YS, all the more difficult.
Harmonic tremor is a particular type of volcanic tremor that exhibits dominant frequencies in equal multiples of a base, dominate frequency. An example of this is a signal that shows dominate frequencies of 1.5, 3, 4.5, 6, 7.5, and 9 Hz. Notice the interval of 1.5 Hz in this case. They show up as repeating bands on a spectrograph. It is very hard to distinguish from a waveform alone, and at this point I would never trust the diagnosis of such a signal from anyone that does not have better tools than simple waveform data on a webicorder. So if all you are viewing is webicorder waveforms, in my opinion, you are not in a position to make a call on whether a tremor signal is harmonic, at all. So don't- plain and simple. Either study and learn how to convert seismic data, or ask one of us that can. At this point on ATS, PuterMan and I both have this ability, that I know of. I have reason to believe that because we use different tools, I may be able to do this slightly easier, but that is just conjecture- and it really doesn't matter.
What does matter though is what I actually see when I am monitoring YS with my rig. Please understand folks that I can make most assessments in seconds with it. I said most, and let me be clear: MOST, not ALL. I still am learning. There are still signatures that occur at the edges of the seismic station coverage that give me the willies sometimes, and I can't do a damn thing about them, or make heads or tails of them. At that point I have to defer to expert's opinions.
For example, what do you think when a signal occurs on the shortband component of seismic station, but not on the broadband component? Or when it occurs on the surface component, but not on the borehole component (in cases where both are co-located and present?) Or worse, when a portion of it occurs on both the shortband and broadband components? Is it telemetry error? Noise? Or is it possibly a shallow, low amplitude level, near-surface signal- a possibility which has been known to occur at certain volcanoes, even during eruptions?
Yes, this is complicated as crap. And that is a reason why there is such little patience to linger around and discuss these things with people like me, and probably you, who just get into observations from the periphery, and not go through the intense schooling necessary to really learn the science of it. I am guilty. Not schooled. The tools of a pro are in the hands of an amateur. But I learn daily. More and more. And make less and less mistakes as time goes on. And as long as my readers understand that, we're all good.
Also, more directly on topic of the current swarms: Update- swarms in lull, and all gone quiet again. Hope it stays that way for a while.edit on Sun Oct 6th 2013 by TrueAmerican because: (no reason given)
A long-range correlation between earthquakes is indicated by some phenomena precursory to strong earthquakes. Most of the major earthquakes show prior seismic activity that in hindsight seems anomalous. The features include changes in regional activity rate and changes in the pattern of small earthquakes, including alignments on unmapped linear features near the (future) main shock. It has long been suggested that large earthquakes are preceded by observable variations in regional seismicity.
Studies on seismic precursors preceding large to great earthquakes with M ≥ 7.5 were carried out in the northeast India region bounded by the area 20°-32°N and 88°-100°E using the earthquake database from 1853 to 1988. It is observed that all earthquakes of M ≥ 7.5, including the two great earthquakes of 1897 and 1950, were preceded by abnormally low anomalous seismicity phases some 11-27 years prior to their occurrence. On the other hand, precursory time periods ranged from 440 to 1,768 days for main shocks with M 5.6-6.5 for the period from 1963 to 1988. Furthermore, the 6 August, 1988 main shock of M 7.5 in the Arakan Yoma fold belt was preceded by well-defined patterns of anomalous seismicity that occurred during 1963-1964, about 25.2 years prior to its occurrence.
The pattern of anomalous seismicity in the form of earthquake swarms preceding major earthquakes in the northeast India region can be regarded as one of the potential seismic precursors. Database constraints have been the main barrier to searching for this precursor preceding smaller earthquakes, which otherwise might have provided additional information on its existence. The entire exercise indicates that anomalous seismicity preceding major shocks is a common seismic pattern for the northeast India region, and can be employed for long-range earthquake prediction when better quality seismological data sets covering a wide range of magnitudes are available. Anomalous seismic activity is distinguished by a much higher annual frequency of earthquake occurrence than in the preceding normal and the following gap episodes.