It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Once again for the HARD OF LEARNING a 30 fps video is NO GOOD to study high speed collisions!!!
TheNewSense
reply to post by wmd_2008
Once again for the HARD OF LEARNING a 30 fps video is NO GOOD to study high speed collisions!!!
But it seems to me that the banned member's argument was based on the sreenshots that were posted, which seem to be the available actual frames.
Does it matter if these frames are part of a 30fps video as opposed to a 1000fps video, for instance?
The frames still show the actual situation at those points.
Are you saying that the posted frames do not show the actual situation at those points?
TheNewSense
reply to post by wmd_2008
I asked you a simple question which you seem to refuse to answer.
So the frames that were posted don't show the state that the plane was in at those points in time?
This is what you are saying?
So lets say I take a picture of a plane in flight, which is one single frame, then what would show up in the picture would not be a representatation of the situation at that point?
Basically what you are saying is that you can't take a picture of a speeding object because it would travel too fast to show up in one frame, which is off course completely ridiculous.
The subtleties of what happens to the aircraft and the structure during that impact cannot show up in that video due to quality and frame rate.
The subtleties of what happens to the aircraft and the structure during that impact cannot show up in that video due to quality and frame rate.
OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by TheNewSense
Neoprad.... *cough, cough*... i mean "TheNewSense", why are you continuing to debate this point, Neopradigams views were basically wrong, its probably what got him banned and I for one must say that i find it very suspicious that a new member such as yourself should pick up the baton on this thread on the LOL forum four days after he gets banned.
To be blunt, I think you are Neopradigram, upon being banned you waited a few days (probably sulked a little and sent of a few emails to some mods) set up a new account just so you could continue with this frankly pathetic line of argument. I of course cannot prove this but what i would say to you is that it really is about time that this thread was laid to rest, think of this as some advice to a "new" member.
Part of a better team too?
it was not supposed to be an attack rather it was more of a friendly warning that you might want to just let this one go and move on.
it was not supposed to be an attack rather it was more of a friendly warning that you might want to just let this one go and move on.
TheNewSense
reply to post by wmd_2008
Again you didn't answer the question.
Do the frames that were posted show the actual situation at that point or not?