I'll stand by what I said because it's not a matter of questioning the events it's the bland accusations of misdoings of thousands of people, with
no evidence at all, just to get attention. Calling everyone from the President, Congress, first responders, firemen, policemen liars and murderous
conspirators with no proof whatsoever. Ruining the lives of people by twisting their words around to make it appear they go along with this non sense.
As OSOTC has pointed out many, many times the same people who post this accusatory diatribe in reality know absolutely nothing about the crime-nothing
at all. They have never studied the plot, the 4 1/2 years it took to come to fruition, they just have the need to blame someone or something for
their failed exorbitance. They don't have the skills or the discipline required to become wealthy so they just label everyone that is successful as
I can agree that there are those who would jump on the bandwagon from the outset.
However it is the very nature of a crime that makes it difficult to unravel, on the face of it, you could almost say that the US administration is
doing much the same thing now by wanting to attack Syria and Assad, (It would be not just be Assad on his tod, it would be foolish to think otherwise)
The administration wants to attack on what is an allegation because "they know" We can't "know" because we are not in the matrix, and because we
are not in the matrix, there is no reason to believe what we have been told. The same applied/applies to 9/11.
I see one post saying Ah!, the towers fell down because they softened, and indeed that was the NIST's view, the towers softened and buckled. No need
even to melt then, because the temperatures would not have been high enough to melt the steel anyway. So the NIST ignored the molten metal that in
fact was pouring out of the south tower, they denied on film that there was molten metal at ground zero for days afterward.
Incredibly, and only recently has anyone on the official side theorised on what the molten metal was, and he speculated that it was molten aluminium
from the aircraft that reacted with the steel and created a 'natural' thermite reaction. WTF! he's hijacked what the Architects & Engineers for
9/11 Truth, have been saying all along, except that their reasearch required a 'super thermite' which they were never able to obtain.
So I agree there is a lot we know little about, and the characters involved. Some things about the characters we do know, George Tenet knew right off
at his breakfast table on the morning of 9/11 which happened to be a press breakfast. His question to an aide was rhetorical, "Could this be the the
Bin Laden guy" as if? it is well known that same info was aired not much later.
Then there is this Bernie Kerik guy, his CV reads like who flung dung on a night out, there is much more to know about him.
Who was the foreign soldier in field uniform ushering people away from the disaster area, "No informations"
There are heaps of anomalies all over 9/11. But I agree, nobody's talking..much.