Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Breaking:Russia Today News Declares 9/11 An Inside Job False Flag Attack. ATS:Time to move it!!!

page: 12
396
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 20 2014 @ 12:57 AM
link   
So I didn't see anyone post this and it would some what go into every one saying it would require a massive cover up to have a team of people to install the demo/thermite/mini nukes pick your poison. One more thing that just conveniently happened on 9-11
911blogger.com...

Seems interesting that they had construction and renovations on the exact floors that were hit and then failed due to fires.. I want to say the company that did it had connections to Cheney via haloburten (sp?) I didn't see that info on that site, just something i remember hearing in a documentary




posted on Mar, 4 2014 @ 03:16 AM
link   
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
 





Thermite cannot cut steel however


then prove the claimed fire did......no one has yet PROVED that claim.

The initial 2005 NIST scientific investigation found NO scientific reason why these three buildings failed on 9-11.....NO supporting evidence the FIRES PRESENT failed any WTC columns to ALLOW collapse to ensue.

yet we allow 2008 NIST to claim fire not only did cause collapse, but did so as NO OTHER buildings has EVER done.

WHY is it official story pushers are the ones whom focus on 'explosives"?


I constantly ask you 'people' to PROVE the claim FIRE....yet ALL of you...'people'...respond with a twist about explosives...actually, I could care less....YOU prove the official claims FIRE did all this work.

take WTC7......a 105 vertical foot interval of acceleration EQUAL to g.

are YOU confused about the word.."gravitational"?

in a natural gravitational collapse, the structural mass that is collapsing breaks and removes structural resistance as it collapses...so, in other words, it is CAUSING itself to collapse...

gravitational ACCELERATION EQUAL to g. of that same structural mass, can only be accomplished by REMOVING the resistance to enable the collapse to proceed...structural mass accelerating equal to g. has NO ability to remove resistance below itself and continue to accelerate @ g.

NCSTAR 1A 3.6] "This free fall drop continues for approximately 8 stories, the distance traveled between t=1.75s and t=4.0s...constant, downward acceleration during this time interval. This acceleration was *9.8m/s^2*, equivalent to the acceleration of gravity."

NICSTAR 1A 4.3.4] Global Collapse..."The entire building above the buckled column region moved downward in a single unit, as observed, completing the global collapse"

NCSTAR1A p.39/130
"the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse of WTC 7."


The NIST WTC7 Fig 3-15 shows the graph with the regression line yielding acceleration of 32.196ft/s^2. SEE the time interval between 1.75 and 4 is 2.25 sec. the interval where WTC7 does achieve a period of free-fall ACCELERATION.


So...WTC7 spent 1/3 of it's collapse accelerating equal to g. the FIRST 1/3.

from fire we can't see???

1A-3.2]"It is likely that much of the burning took place beyond the views of the windows"


so, the point here is TELL ME about this "brand new never before seen physics phenomenon" that is claimed to fall these three buildings that ONLY seemed to occur on 9-11 and NEVER again....
as stated here by NIST 2008...

Nist Tech Briefing

Shyam Sunder, all through the Q&A section of the video stating, ....."brand new event"..."new phenomenon"..."there has *NEVER* been a collapse like WTC7".



posted on Jul, 15 2014 @ 03:10 AM
link   
i thought this was already a publicly known fact that 9-11 is CIA sponsored False Flag ... are there people who still believed that 9-11 was commited by a bunch of arabs with minimal training of flying and yet hit the twin towers in their 1st pass ?



posted on Jul, 15 2014 @ 03:20 AM
link   
a reply to: milomilo

these people here are having a hard time believing the FACTS posted about the 2008 official claim that fell WTC7....a new physics phenomenon that only occurred on 9-11..called "low temp thermal expansion"



"the phenomenon that we saw on 9/11 that brought this particular building down was really thermal expansion, which occurs at lower temperatures."


to which this NEW phenomenon removed, BEFORE 1.74 seconds, 105 vertical feet of structural mass to allow the found global unified acceleration equal to g. by the 2005 NIST....

105 vertical feet of LOAD BEARING continuous vertical support....
8 floors of truss assemblies with carrier beams...
lateral, cross, and diagonal bracing throughout...
tens of thousands of bolts and welds...
office contents...
utilities....

warm steel at one end of the building..? is responsible?...according to the 2008 NIST hypothesis crew whom REFUSE peer review of their only supporting evidence....refuse to release the 68,000+ files of data variables that tell the models how to act.



posted on Jul, 16 2014 @ 01:07 AM
link   
a reply to: FlyersFan

You're certainly entitled to your opinion, but you sound a little too sure of yourself.

I think there is enough evidence to question the events of 9/11. You can't go as far to say that the despicable politicians would take advantage of a 9/11 situation, and then claim they aren't despicable enough to have perpetrated it.

It's not a huge leap of imagination to go from one conclusion to another.



posted on Jul, 18 2014 @ 12:24 PM
link   
Theres a new video just found on Youtube related showing how "9/11" can have a hidden subliminal message attached to it see it here you will be amazed. never been seen before.

viralparse.com...



posted on Jul, 18 2014 @ 12:45 PM
link   
a reply to: rkingpin

I tried the link but there is no video?



posted on Jul, 19 2014 @ 03:15 AM
link   
a reply to: rkingpin

don't know bout anyone else but I don't give personal info just to see a page......



posted on Jul, 29 2014 @ 06:02 PM
link   
Obama needs to admit 9/11 was a conspiracy. George Bush needs to get on CNN and admit it. Once people like this go public, the revolution will begin. Until then, nothing will get done. There has yet to be any smoking gun or footage that 100% convinces your everyday American sheep that 9/11 was completely a theatrical excessive of military proportions planned nearly 30 years prior.

Yes, there is proof already uncovered by conspiracy theorists all over YouTube that prove 9/11 is complete BS. Unfortunately, this somehow isn't enough to get the ball rolling.



posted on Jul, 29 2014 @ 06:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: rkingpin

I tried the link but there is no video?


I'm not sure if this is the video in question but I thought I'd post it anyway.

www.youtube.com...
edit on 29-7-2014 by Ross Cross because: (no reason given)





new topics

top topics



 
396
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join