reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
Thermite cannot cut steel however
then prove the claimed fire did......no one has yet PROVED that claim.
The initial 2005 NIST scientific investigation found NO scientific reason why these three buildings failed on 9-11.....NO supporting evidence the
FIRES PRESENT failed any WTC columns to ALLOW collapse to ensue.
yet we allow 2008 NIST to claim fire not only did cause collapse, but did so as NO OTHER buildings has EVER done.
WHY is it official story pushers are the ones whom focus on 'explosives"?
I constantly ask you 'people' to PROVE the claim FIRE....yet ALL of you...'people'...respond with a twist about explosives...actually, I could
care less....YOU prove the official claims FIRE did all this work.
take WTC7......a 105 vertical foot interval of acceleration EQUAL to g.
are YOU confused about the word.."gravitational"?
in a natural gravitational collapse, the structural mass that is collapsing breaks and removes structural resistance as it collapses...so, in other
words, it is CAUSING itself to collapse...
gravitational ACCELERATION EQUAL to g. of that same structural mass, can only be accomplished by REMOVING the resistance to enable the collapse to
proceed...structural mass accelerating equal to g. has NO ability to remove resistance below itself and continue to accelerate @ g.
NCSTAR 1A 3.6] "This free fall drop continues for approximately 8 stories, the distance traveled between t=1.75s and t=4.0s...constant, downward
acceleration during this time interval. This acceleration was *9.8m/s^2*, equivalent to the acceleration of gravity."
NICSTAR 1A 4.3.4] Global Collapse..."The entire building above the buckled column region moved downward in a single unit, as observed, completing the
"the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse of WTC 7."
The NIST WTC7 Fig 3-15 shows the graph with the regression line yielding acceleration of 32.196ft/s^2. SEE the time interval between 1.75 and 4 is
2.25 sec. the interval where WTC7 does achieve a period of free-fall ACCELERATION.
So...WTC7 spent 1/3 of it's collapse accelerating equal to g. the FIRST 1/3.
from fire we can't see???
1A-3.2]"It is likely that much of the burning took place beyond the views of the windows"
so, the point here is TELL ME about this "brand new never before seen physics phenomenon" that is claimed to fall these three buildings that ONLY
seemed to occur on 9-11 and NEVER again....
as stated here by NIST 2008...
Nist Tech Briefing
Shyam Sunder, all through the Q&A section of the video stating, ....."brand new event"..."new phenomenon"..."there has *NEVER* been a collapse