It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
Well if people are not concerned that chemicle weopons ingredients are in the toothpaste and the water then sodium flouride must be at saturation point.
Originally posted by maythetruthbeknown
There is clearly an agenda and the title is misleading. But that is the daily Mail for you.
It is painting the picture that Assad was responsible and the chemical were supplied by UK.
However Assad already possessed the chemical weapons. As I stated above . what if the chemicals were for the rebels and what the DM has done is unwittingly uncovered the source of some of the chemicals used to make sarin.
The rebels do have sarin and have been caught with it in Turkey before. Where did they get it?....
Originally posted by Dark Vengeance
Sodium Fluoride is used for lots of legit reasons.
Originally posted by r0nsix
reply to post by maythetruthbeknown
DOES THIS NOT PROVE ASSADS INNOCENCE?
he did not need to buy chemicals if he has stockpiles of the stuff
Originally posted by RiotComing
Originally posted by Dark Vengeance
Sodium Fluoride is used for lots of legit reasons.
There are NO legit reasons to use sodium fluoride.
If you disagree, then you are brainwashed by the propaganda (with its roots in Nazi concentration camps)
There is NOTHING good about fluoride. Nothing.
Originally posted by maythetruthbeknown
reply to post by whywhynot
If this is true, which I believe it is at the moment. Would they not be able to be held accountable for the supply of said chemicals. Or maybe these are the chemicals the rebels managed to get hold of.
1 bit I found strange was
Last week it was revealed that the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) had granted export licences in 2012 – but they were not used to send sodium fluoride to Syria.
Why grant licences and not send the goods... Something does not add up....edit on 7-9-2013 by maythetruthbeknown because: (no reason given)edit on 7-9-2013 by maythetruthbeknown because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by RiotComing
Originally posted by Dark Vengeance
Sodium Fluoride is used for lots of legit reasons.
There are NO legit reasons to use sodium fluoride. If you disagree, then you are brainwashed by the propaganda (with its roots in Nazi concentration camps) which enables the vast majority of the population to be continuously poisoned on a 24/7 basis. Blockage of the pineal gland being one of the esoteric symptoms that many are unaware of. The Nazis were able to prove that fluoride made their captives docile. It also proved to be a perfect method of profiting from the waste byproduct of aluminium once that industry boomed in the 60s, 70s and 80s. And to have this poison infused in our toothpaste and have dentists tell us it is good for us - and placed in our drinking water - is the ultimate mind-trip inflicted on humankind.
There is NOTHING good about fluoride. Nothing.edit on 8-9-2013 by RiotComing because: (no reason given)
Sodium Fluoride is used in most toothpastes, mouthwashes, dental varnish, dental preparations and nutritional supplements. This same form of fluoride is used as an insecticide and pesticide, as a preservative in glues, as a growth inhibitor for bacteria, fungi and mold. Sodium fluoride is also used in making steel and aluminum products. Added to molten metal, sodium fluoride creates a more uniform metal. Other industrial uses for sodium fluoride include glass frosting and wood preservatives. Sodium Fluoride is also used in the manufacture of chemical and biological weapons. Although this form of fluoride can be used for water fluoridation, the next two forms listed are almost always used due to cost.