Evolutionists ! Explain this and make sense at the same time.

reply to post by ReturnoftheSonofNothing

Only if you squint real hard and turn off part of your brain (the critical thinking part)...Rational Wiki Entry on Henry Makow

Nice "source"...

Makes the National Enquirer look respectable.

"We all know that RationalWiki is a liberal propaganda site..." Link

"a horrible piece of establishment propaganda... littered with false statements and ad hominem. I imagine that the whole of the wiki is a collection of gatekeepers for consensus science and PTB doctrine...." www.fmotl.com...

"...anyone can anonymously write whatever they want (but correction of the tripe written will be considered “vandalism”!) RationalWiki is one of those sites. RationalWiki is a project of Trent Toulouse, who has the stated objective of “exposing conspiracy theories”. He once implied that he considers a conspiracy theory everything that disagrees with mainstream dogma, making RationalWiki a platform for anyone with an agenda to attack researchers struggling to bring important facts to public attention." owndoc.com...

"RationalWiki is now just another outlet for #FTBullies ideology... they are totally baboon property. Monkeys dancing for the organ grinder... the "talk" pages for their hatchet job/character assassination wiki entries show how utterly corrupt it is..." twitter.com...

"Their alternative weapon is called "rational wiki" (an oxymoron) and it is allegedly ran by a student named Toulouse, from Hamilton, Canada. He is as real as that shady guy who runs wikipedia.org, with an added character feature of inferiority complex. Of course, it is possible that he too does not exist (a made-up character), or that he has been co-opted by intelligence services, as they do draft students.

RationalWiki is a genetic-egalitarian race-denialist propaganda website that is run by Ontario resident Trent Toulouse. RationalWiki is a wiki founded by secular humanists in response to Conservapedia. They regard Richard Dawkins as their messiah. It is based on MediaWiki, like Metapedia. The wiki has around 4200 English pages middle of May 2010. The information is inaccurate and sparse. The wiki begs for donations. The site is extremely anti-Christian and anti-Conservative and promotes sodomy and gun restriction.

The website fraudulently portrays itself as being “rational”, and opposed to “pseudoscience”, yet promotes exactly the thing that they claim to oppose: the irrational spiritual pseudosciences of genetic egalitarianism and race denialism. On top of such deceptiveness, Trent Toulouse solicits donations (on the website’s main page) under these false pretenses. That fits within the definition of criminal fraud." A note on "Rational Wiki"

"Some of the most untrue bunch of lies that could ever be written in the entire world were written by RationalWiki. They claim that they are the truth and the holy appointed protectors of science and their subjects. They do not tell the truth. RationalWiki is the biggest con job on the internet. It is the National Enquirer of skeptical thought.

They are like Stormfront for intellectual people that pimp a platform of hate and scorn for those that they hate, no matter how wrong and biased that they are and kudos for those that they DO like. RationalWiki is the most biased thing out there on the internet today. They are NOT rational or intelligent. RationalWiki is a fraud factory. It is a quack’s encyclopedia. They are pseudo-intellectual quackery at its finest. RationalWiki is a joke!" Source

Take, for example, the RationalWiki article on pseudoscience. One merely has to lightly read through it to see some of the most arrogant statements that can be made. ...there is no excuse for passing this kind of blithely arrogant and shallow material off as anything other than trash, and that’s not even dealing with the factual inaccuracies.

The entire site is plagued by trash (the only suitable term) of this nature. I have no doubts that RationalWiki is just a front for Left-Wing Progressivism (a type of Socialism, basically), based on the style of the writing and the methods of argumentation used.

RationalWiki is a Front for Socialist Indoctrination

reply to post by randyvs


It's a supernatural explanation, where a natural one is perfectly sufficient.

reply to post by Murgatroid


Judging from your sources I'd guess you'd be completely happy with Conservapaedia... Or basically anything to the right of Ghengis Khan.

Nothing but loonies, the lot of them.

reply to post by ReturnoftheSonofNothing

It's a supernatural explanation, where a natural one is perfectly sufficient.

This could be true. I wouldn't know because you haven't written it out
so i still have never seen nor heard your natural explanation for nature
let alone existence. if you don't really have one you should say,
I don't have one.

randyvs
reply to post by ReturnoftheSonofNothing

 

It's a supernatural explanation, where a natural one is perfectly sufficient.

This could be true. I wouldn't know because you haven't written it out
so i still have never seen nor heard your natural explanation for nature
let alone existence. if you don't really have one you should say,
I don't have one.

Haven't written it out? My explanation for nature? For existence?

Boggled..

The natural explanation I accept for the diversity of life around us is modern synthesis.

As for origin of life? I don't know. I lean towards some kind of abiogenesis or panspermia, but who knows really.. It's all guesswork at the moment.

reply to post by ReturnoftheSonofNothing

As for origin of life? I don't know. I lean towards some kind of abiogenesis or panspermia, but who knows really.. It's all guesswork at the moment.

So you don't know, or you lean to an explanation that effectively has no chance at all, of
actually happening or maybe on a good day, carries a ! in 10/125 chance of happening.
I don't see how, " God did it " can be so unacceptable to you and that's my point.

" An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now,
could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the
moment to be almost a miracle "..

Francis Crick

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

Arthur C. Clarke

reply to post by randyvs


I make no claim of knowledge of the origin of life. Unlike creationists..

reply to post by ReturnofTheSonOfNothing


And I only know and believe what the Bible tells me. Creationists believe the Holy
scriptures like everything else came into exisrence for a reason. Not because Man
has a good imagination. But because he was a meticulous record keeper from
the start. Always has been And I'm afraid that people who call it a book of fairytales ?
Really can't be very bright.

reply to post by Murgatroid


Erm, you do realise that RationalWiki was founded by people who were driven away from Conservapedia don't you? And I'd never describe as being socialist. For one thing I've met socialists and I have a passing idea about what socialism is.

randyvs
reply to post by ReturnofTheSonOfNothing

 

And I only know and believe what the Bible tells me. Creationists believe the Holy
scriptures like everything else came into exisrence for a reason. Not because Man
has a good imagination. But because he was a meticulous record keeper from
the start. Always has been And I'm afraid that people who call it a book of fairytales ?
Really can't be very bright.

I'm sorry, are you trying to say that the Bible is a factual account that is corroborated by history? Because if you are I think you have a very nasty shock coming to you.

randyvs
reply to post by ReturnofTheSonOfNothing

 

Prolly a good point. Back on topic.
You seem to have some solid interest in this thread Son you go'in to school ?
You follow evolution ?

I was just reading this back and the penny dropped. I can now see you were intending to use a shortened version of my username when you said "Son". Sorry, first time through I thought you were being patronising. It wasn't entirely clear at the time, but apologies for that.

Son, SON, s.o.n, ROTSON and Mr Meanie Atheist Doo-Doo Head are all acceptable. Anything is really.

But please, if you could, bold the text when you use my name so I know you are referring to me. Thanks.

randyvs
And I only know and believe what the Bible tells me.

Unfortunately, the debate ends with this statement.

There is nothing I can say, no argument I could make which could penetrate or shake this paradigm. Really, what I can say to that? There is just no way through it.

reply to post by Murgatroid

So, like all of your other posts, your case against RationalWiki is a bunch of other people's opinion blogs and a "Freeman-On-The-Land" forum? Why don't you actually try and point out the factual inaccuracies in the RW page that was linked to? Otherwise, you're just engaging in an ad hominem attack.

reply to post by iterationzero

Why don't you actually try and point out the factual inaccuracies in the RW page that was linked to?

Simply because evolutionists simply ignore reality, slink into denial, and walk away when presented with the scientific facts.

This thread and many others just like it make that obvious.

The real issue in my opinion is WHY do people believe in the official state backed religion of Darwinism?

Even atheist's like Carlin realized that it's obvious that we are being lied to...

WHY do people even believe what TPTB are telling them?



Simple common sense tears so many holes in the idea of evolution that it becomes completely obvious that evolution is in FACT the real "faith"...

"The more one studies paleontology, the more certain one becomes that evolution is based on faith alone." ~ paleontologist T.L. Moor

Scientific facts prove that it is an impossible deliberate fraud which is COMPLETELY contradicted by evidence and science.

"We [evolutionists] have been telling our students for years not to accept any statement on its face value but to examine the evidence, and therefore it is rather a shock to discover that we have failed to follow our own sound advice." ~ John T. Bonner

"Most of what is being taught in university classrooms today, in biology, and also in physics and mathematics, is actually not science at all, but essentially a variety of religious cult, whose immediate roots can be traced, among other things, to the Cathars and Bogomils of the medieval "dark ages"!

True, this cult, which controls much of our educational system and scientific community, naturally does not advertise itself openly as a fanatic form of irrationalist belief; rather, it calls itself "the scientific establishment"; it typically brands those who refuse to accept its most egregious doctrines, as "unscientific."

Now, it is easy to show that Darwinism, one of the pillars of modern biology, is nothing but a kind of cult, a cult religion. I am not exaggerating. It has no scientific validity whatsoever. Darwin's so-called theory of evolution is based on absurdly irrational propositions, which did not come from scientific observations, but were artificially introduced from the outside, for political-ideological reasons."

Jonathan Tennenbaum: Toward a True Science of Life

reply to post by randyvs

I only know and believe what the Bible tells me.
-randyvs

So every post you've made in this thread was just trolling. You pretend to request explanation when all you intend to do is.....

I only know and believe what the Bible tells me, because I only know and believe what the Bible tells me, because I only know and believe what the Bible tells me, because I only know and believe what the Bible tells me, because I only know and believe what the Bible tells me, because I only know and believe what the Bible tells me, because I only know and believe what the Bible tells me, because, I only know and believe what the Bible tells me, because I only know and believe what the Bible tells me, because I only know and believe what the Bible tells me.

At least your admitting to being a dishonest creationist, luckily we got a thread for that.

randyvs
reply to post by ReturnofTheSonOfNothing

 

And I only know and believe what the Bible tells me. Creationists believe the Holy
scriptures like everything else came into exisrence for a reason. Not because Man
has a good imagination. But because he was a meticulous record keeper from
the start. Always has been And I'm afraid that people who call it a book of fairytales ?
Really can't be very bright.

I fear it would be quite the opposite result that you proclaim it would be if we were to actually gauge the intelligence levels of the two factions.

DP

reply to post by LightOrange

I fear it would be quite the opposite result that you proclaim it would be if we were to actually gauge the intelligence levels of the two factions.

And I have good reason to doubt that's not all you fear. But why play at words ?

We're here and so is the universe. We exist together indivisible. Following the example of
nature, we see there is a cause for everything that comes into existence. Everything that exists
was caused to exist by something else. The only way any rational person can fathom all of this
existence ? The most obvious, logical answer can't be an impossibility of random chance confined
to the capture of the universe. i suggest the only logic leaves leaves exactly what we've from
the times closer to our origins. Sorry if you've dreams are crushed and you have to change
your life styles and shape up. Stop being such spoiled lil brats and wanting your way cause

IT'S NOT HAPPENING !

randyvs
reply to post by polarwarrior

 

I don't have to send out a persy lil invite for people to know all are welcome to comment. Do I ?
I only ask that evolutionists make some sense of these skulls. Where do they fit in the theory.
Of course they don't, do they ?

Where do they fit in your bible? They don't.