It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Alekto
wishes
So what I just did was send a message to Mr. Fulford and asked him if it was a nuclear detonation that set off the earthquake and tsunami how the seismo signatures would have been made to make it look like earthquakes and not underground explosions... We'll see if he reads... and then responds... in the next couple weeks. He lives in Japan and has a lot of connections so I'd say he's at least in a position to have insider knowledge.
I don't know a lot about the guy,just came across his stuff a few weeks ago - but he's an extremely prolific investigative writer, has written several books in Japanese, is very well connected (comes from a Canadian political/diplomatic family), and speaks several languages. Doesn't mean everything thing he says is 'absolutely correct' - however it does tell me this guy's story is well worth considering no matter how far out there it may seem. There are so many videos and interviews online, would take weeks to go through them all...
Is the idea that it was not a subduction event remotely suspect for that magnitude of an earthquake?
Best of luck with determining how an imaginary nuke set off The Fukushima Hamadōri earthquake. Send Ben our regards! He's regarded as something of a joke figure in Japan.
The 9.1 released more energy than every other quake that year combined. It was one HELL of an earthquake, though according to my latest research it was not a subduction event.
Stephen O'Neal
October 22, 2012 at 9:19 pm
Having handled quite a few fuel assemblies over reactors and fuel pools, I have some thoughts about this situation, especially given that it is described as having planet threatening proportions. First, the assemblies, now at minimum of eighteen months (and many much longer) out of the reactor, require significantly reduced cooling, and might be extractable from the pool by helicopter (particularly if the airship is shadowed by a metal plate fixture just above the assembly on the handling cable) and then placed into shipping casks. These casks, like the ones routinely used for spent fuel rods in the U.S., can be much cheaper under emergency circumstances, but fully effective for relocation and certainly cooling requirements, within some limits. A procedure and a grappling fixture are needed to grasp and carry the assemblies – air exposure is not a problem as long as distance and time constraints are observed, and some risk would seem reasonable given the looming consequences of doing nothing. Of course, I would never have signed off on the bone headed idea of elevating the spent fuel pool in the first place, but for sure, common sense and a tiny bit of engineering talent must surely be available somewhere today. Another thing, since TEPCO apparently went cheap on diesel backup, they might consider making a base hit by placing some water pumps at the pool to bathe the assemblies if the structure subsides. Just keeping them wet, with a little bit of convective and evaporative cooling from modest water flow would prevent a disaster. Any chance of criticality could be removed with a nice inventory of Borax on hand, until the more reactive assemblies are removed. I suspect that the efficacy of the grappling tool could be enhanced by sizing it to the pool rack cell dimensions and making a slip fit to grab the upper foot or so of the assembly once it has cleared the rack, making it safer to carry by air. Cable length versus radiation dose would be a routine calculation for pilots’ safety margins, plus of course, a meter. Fuel assemblies are heavy, but well within the capabilities of some craft. Orinarily a minimum of six feet of water is sufficient shielding, and the cable distance to the airship will not have to be density proportionately longer if inverse distance squared and the effect of the scattering plate are included. If this thing is so damn dangerous, then we ought to be doing this right now.
Fifty-one crew members of the USS Ronald Reagan say they are suffering from a variety of cancers as a direct result of their involvement in Operation Tomodachi, a U.S. rescue mission in Fukushima after the nuclear disaster in March 2011. The affected sailors are suing Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), alleging that the utility mishandled the crisis and did not adequately warn the crew of the risk of participating in the earthquake relief efforts.
It is possible it was 'normal' but we really dont know what goes on between governments and the technology is available to generate some focused energy waves.
Rather than lay the blame at the feet of imaginary nuclear weapons, I'd like to remind you that the earthquake occurred as a result of normal faulting to the west of Iwaki.
Fishermen have been unable to hatch eggs or release young fish on five rivers in the prefecture because the hatcheries are located within the evacuation zone around the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant.
Alekto
Rather than lay the blame at the feet of imaginary nuclear weapons, I'd like to remind you that the earthquake occurred as a result of normal faulting to the west of Iwaki.
BEIJING, Dec. 28 (Xinhua) -- Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's visit to the notorious Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo that honors Japan's war dead including convicted war criminals in World War II is but a flagrant denial of the just trials of Japanese warmongers guilty of crimes against humanity.
Abe on Thursday visited the war shrine, which has been seen as a symbol of Japan's past militarism as it enshrines 14 Class-A WWII war criminals.
It is the first time in seven years a sitting Japanese prime minister has visited the shrine. Former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi paid a visit in August 2006, souring relations between Japan and its Asian neighbors.
wishes
reply to post by qmantoo
Yes, most disturbing... "Having handled quite a few fuel assemblies over reactors and fuel pools, I have some thoughts about this situation, especially given that it is described as having planet threatening proportions."
I've also heard of HAARP being involved in things - I mean what are they supposed to do when they have been given trillions of dollars to develop all these 'toys'... 'not' use them? I met Nick Begich (Angels Don't Play This HAARP) about 15 years ago and had a chance to chat privately for over an hour about HAARP... at that time he said it wasn't fully operational - yet - that it could alter moods and make a population extremely agitated all at once or whatever they wanted to 'inflict'.
They have the technology. All they need is a motive which I believe they also have. Interesting. Always interesting... and usually really depressing...
"If" the Fukushima earthquake/tsunami was created to cause massive destruction, then it makes sense that it is being 'left' to continue doing damage. What doesn't make sense is why it's never been treated as a potential global catastrophe and dealt with accordingly with all the great minds from around the world getting together to actually deal with it. It is largely ignored and off limits to prying eyes and help. Why? What's the motive? Who benefits? Hmm....edit on 22-12-2013 by wishes because: (no reason given)
pheonix358
reply to post by wishes
I disagree.
They are not doing anything meaningful because there simply is no solution to this problem.
We do not have the tech to solve this.
It is what it is and from all the indicators the core of reactor 1 has left the building.
I think they are hoping that the cores will melt their way into the earth and bury themselves.
Everything else is a dog and pony show to keep us satisfied.
P
qmantoo
Basically, we are talking beliefs here.
Destinyone
Alekto
Rather than lay the blame at the feet of imaginary nuclear weapons, I'd like to remind you that the earthquake occurred as a result of normal faulting to the west of Iwaki.
And who's great idea was it to build nuclear reactors on a fault line, and locate them on the ocean front. Never forget that humans made deals in back rooms, for profit, in deciding where to locate these death traps.
Des