So according to Kerry and Obama, there will be no boots on the ground in Syria.
What i fail to understand is how can they say there will be no boots on the ground, when its no secret, Syria has massive amounts of Chemical weapons
of mass destruction, so when we the west bomb the crap out of Syria back into the 10th century, who is going to secure all these weapons of mass
destruction, so rebel forces and rouge groups don't get there hands on them.
Its impossible to say we won't have boots on the ground as its plain insanity and lack of pre-planning surely , are we to go by faith, that Al Nusa
and Al-Qeada and of the rest of the arm gangs roaming around Syria won't touch these weapons.
Al Nusa and Al-Qeada and other militant gangs have no regard for international law.
The simple fact is, we can't bomb Syria without a massive force on the ground to secure and depose of these chemical weapons from falling into the
If we bomb Syria without a serious ground force the world will be a more dangerous place, and if we send in a ground force, you can pretty much
guarantee it will lead to a world war.
The general public are being spun a incredible lie about it being a limited strike.
We all know its not about the Syrian people and all about pipelineistan.
Boots on the ground have always been on the agenda, but if the public were to know this, they wouldn't accept it, so they will tell you once the
bombing starts, that dew to unforeseen circumstance on the ground, they need to put boots on the ground.
This is a war of deals not bullets
edit on 6-9-2013 by snapperski because: (no reason given)