I am not well study in physics. So, I would like those who are more educated on the subject to please explain the gaps in his arguments, so that I may
look into them more in-depth.
edit on 5-9-2013 by ServantOfTheLamb because: (no reason given)
Please if you don't want to watch the video don't comment. I posted this post in order to increase my own understanding, and only for those who are
kind enough to share their thoughts with me.
edit on 5-9-2013 by ServantOfTheLamb because: (no reason given)
If you haven't seen his debate against Richard Dawkins, and you enjoyed this video that one is very good as well
edit on 5-9-2013 by
ServantOfTheLamb because: (no reason given)
I understand that, but the video is far outside my realm of knowledge, and I wouldn't even know where to begin. Physics is not a subject I am familiar
with, but I know many say it disproves God, but it seems this guy very well explains why laws of natures cannot push out the idea of a God. Again this
thread is to further my own knowledge on the subjects presented, and I just wanted more educated individuals opinions on the video, because I do not
believe I have the knowledge to form an educated opinion lol.
edit on 5-9-2013 by ServantOfTheLamb because: (no reason given)
I watched it all. This is actually the second time I have seen it. He is brilliant and most of this does not center on physics, but on logic and
philosophy. He shows the absurdity of denying the evident nature of creation being created. Very good stuff and shows just how irrational science is
by denying a Creator.
Yes, but I was curious if his arguments only hold merit, because I do not fully grasp the concept of the physics that he counters with logic and
philosophy.
edit on 5-9-2013 by ServantOfTheLamb because: (no reason given)