It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
reply to post by swanne
The primary pattern for this is the Father (Strong House) and the Mother (Strong Waters). The Son (House of Seed) is what we created as two become one.
Father in Hebrew is Aleph Bet (Letters).
Mother is Aleph Mem (Strong Waters). She is the catalyst for the letters to make words from DNA.
Son is Bet Nun (House of Seed). The Son is what is created from the other two (yin/yang).
edit on 5-9-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
Right now all there is, is what you can see and hear and touch but the mind pretends that there is so much more.
Originally posted by Aphorism
Another point is that "consciousness causes collapse" interpretation of the observer effect by New Age mystics is unfalsifiable. It cannot be proven right nor wrong, and therefore exists outside the realm of science. So it becomes apparent that science is cherry-picked where it supports mystical claims, and decried when it does the opposite.
Originally posted by swanne
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
Right now all there is, is what you can see and hear and touch but the mind pretends that there is so much more.
That is falsified by the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum mechanics. Instead of pretending things one cannot see doesn't exists, Many-World actually accepts the existence of things (histories) one cannot see... which act almost as an unification between Einstein's deterministic interpretation and Bohr's probabilistic interpretation.
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
If a tree falls in a wood and there is nothing there to hear it can it make a sound?
Originally posted by swanne
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
If a tree falls in a wood and there is nothing there to hear it can it make a sound?
Science answers that as long as there is air displacement (aka, not in total vacuum), and the displacement has enough velocity, it'll make a sound because it follows physical laws, not human hearing.
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
Nothing can appear without you being there and you cannot prove otherwise.
Originally posted by swanne
There are such things as absolutes... otherwise one could not exist unless one had sensory inputs. Rocks can't see nor hear one another.. yet they exist.
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
You shine the light of consciousness (the beam) and you see.
Things appear to exist when you look at them
Originally posted by swanne
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
You shine the light of consciousness (the beam) and you see.
Consciousness is not a beam. It is an abstract concept.
Originally posted by swanne
Imagine for an instant you look at your home. Then you turn away to look somewhere else. Then you turn back to look again at your house. If what you say is true, and things really materialize out of nothingness when you stare at something, then when you see your house, its materialization should displace a large amount of air, and create a loud sonic "boom". Which obviously doesn't happen in experimentation.
Have you heard that atoms are made of 99.9999% empty space?
The house is made of nothing - everything is made of nothing but it looks like something or feels like something but it only appears when there is an observer.
The seer and seen are one.
The seer and seen are one.
Originally posted by rawheroine
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
reply to post by swanne
The primary pattern for this is the Father (Strong House) and the Mother (Strong Waters). The Son (House of Seed) is what we created as two become one.
Father in Hebrew is Aleph Bet (Letters).
Mother is Aleph Mem (Strong Waters). She is the catalyst for the letters to make words from DNA.
Son is Bet Nun (House of Seed). The Son is what is created from the other two (yin/yang).
edit on 5-9-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)
Is there a Daughter, or are the Jews and Xtians kind of like the Chinese when it comes to girl children?
Nice thread, OP.