It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AthiestJesus
That's exactly what I wrote. If we have bombing victims then by necessity we have a bombing. So musings on things that look "strange" can not be evidence of no bombing when we have victims of a bombing. It's logic 101.
Wow man , you`re all over the place .
The evide.... your "evidence" is not proof of a bombing . What you wrote , what I quoted , was ignorant. Why are you trying to spin away from what you wrote ?
edit on 5-9-2013 by AthiestJesus because: (no reason given)edit on 5-9-2013 by AthiestJesus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by AthiestJesus
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
And back to your evidence
So you`re telling me that cupcakes and little baby jesus made jeff forget he`d just had his legs torn from his body ?
Are you a receptionist by any chance ?
Go ask Jeff why. What does that have to do with the hundreds of bombing victim patients and thousands of Medical professionals who helped them?
No, I graduated top of my class Cum Laude as a member of the National Honor Society from Salem State University and work as a Clinical Counselor, a position that requires a college education. I also have a genius IQ. Good job on your failed personal attack, not that your attack or my reply has anything whatsoever to do with my evidence, which you still will not respond to.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by AthiestJesus
That's exactly what I wrote. If we have bombing victims then by necessity we have a bombing. So musings on things that look "strange" can not be evidence of no bombing when we have victims of a bombing. It's logic 101.
Wow man , you`re all over the place .
The evide.... your "evidence" is not proof of a bombing . What you wrote , what I quoted , was ignorant. Why are you trying to spin away from what you wrote ?
edit on 5-9-2013 by AthiestJesus because: (no reason given)edit on 5-9-2013 by AthiestJesus because: (no reason given)
I havent spun from anything, please explain to me how first hand accounts from Doctors and Nurses from many different hospitals of their caring for the wounded victims not evidence. What would you call it?
Nothing you say has any merit whatsoever until you deal with the HUNDREDS of patients that were cared for by THOUSANDS of hospital employees, with several deaths and many amputations
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by AthiestJesus
The fact you think hundreds of patients cared for by medical professionals that are on record talking about their first hand accounts is not evidence is proof you are not interested in evidence.
When someone has a youtube video of being shot, they go to the hospital with gun shot wounds, the Doctors and Nurses who treated them talk about the ordeal, you can't claim there was never any gun. If you want to do so you left reality and entered some fantasy world. That is exactly what you are doing. A bullet was pulled out of the victim and you are saying there was no gun, no shooting.
If there are bombing victims, there was a bombing. You can not have victims with no incident. I haven't spun from anything. None of your "this looks wrong to me" statements have any meaning whatsoever when a bombing is proved to have occured through the fact we have victims. As I said, logic 101. Now, if you can explain away the hundreds of victims and all the firsthand accounts of all the medical professionals who treated them, we can then discuss those other things. As of now, we have a bullet and a gunshot wound, a gun was fired.
Originally posted by AthiestJesus
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by AthiestJesus
The fact you think hundreds of patients cared for by medical professionals that are on record talking about their first hand accounts is not evidence is proof you are not interested in evidence.
Nope , it`s proof that I think they`re talking crap . And combined with the physical evidence I conclude that they in fact are , talking crap.
When someone has a youtube video of being shot, they go to the hospital with gun shot wounds, the Doctors and Nurses who treated them talk about the ordeal, you can't claim there was never any gun. If you want to do so you left reality and entered some fantasy world. That is exactly what you are doing. A bullet was pulled out of the victim and you are saying there was no gun, no shooting.
Yeah , see .... now I`m in a fantasy world ........ but you`re the one creating an imaginary shooting just to try and prove your point
Originally posted by Onslaught2996
This thread is proof of one thing..some people are just plain stupid and ignorant.
I mean really..staged? Do these type of people need constant help to get through their daily lives?..
For some to show them how to eat, to breathe and and where do go to the bathroom?
ar·gu·ment
[ahr-gyuh-muhnt] Show IPA
noun
2.
a discussion involving differing points of view; debate: They were deeply involved in an argument about inflation.
3.
a process of reasoning; series of reasons: I couldn't follow his argument.
4.
a statement, reason, or fact for or against a point: This is a strong argument in favor of her theory.
5.
an address or composition intended to convince or persuade; persuasive discourse.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Threads like this make me sick. They are ignorant.
THe victims are real. The people who died are real. The limbs blown off in Boston were real.
The families are deep in grief and don't want pictures of their dead children plastered on the news.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by AthiestJesus
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
What , so you work at a hospital and think that gives you a higher standing than everyone else ? , you have already made it very clear that you believe you are the only person in this thread who knows what happened . And you`re trying to make an argument out of how many patients / doctors there`s supposed to have been .
No, it gives me insight into just how many people would have to be "in on it" you might not have, which is why I explained the different positions so you could get some idea. I offered evidence supporting an actual bombing. No one even bothered to look at the evidence before concluding it was wrong, as evidenced by the fact people kept asking questions that are explained in the evidence I provided.