It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Who did you enjoy more?

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 09:59 PM
link   
Nick Pope or Tom Carey?
Why?
While I didn't contribute to either thread I read throufh both. Questions and answers.

For me it would be Tom Carey.
Nick Pope couldn't answer several questions because of his security clearance. While it did give his thread a cloack and dagger feel, it kind of made it boring for me. Besides that, the buy my book to find out kind of pissed me off. Every has to make a livinf,but hey.

Tom Carey on the other hand answered most questions he was asked in an easy to follow order. While he mentions a book of his he still gives you some insight. He wasn't shy or easily intimitated by our members. A couple of disagreements with some members and his sarcasims upped rhe entertainment factor of the thread for me.

I enjoyed both AMAs and thank both for contributing. Can't wait for more.

So Tom Carey for me. How about you ATS?
edit on 4-9-2013 by Isittruee because: yea spelling..so shoot me





posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 10:06 PM
link   
reply to post by Isittruee
 


I would have to say Tom. Only because I love the Roswell case. It's what got me into UFOs and the like.



-SAP-



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 10:25 PM
link   
They're both former, ahem, intel operatives. Neither one seems to have a real clue. Make of it what you will.



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 10:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Isittruee
 


For me, reading it, it was easy to tell who had been a government agent, and who hadn't. The responses, and the honesty in them, is stark when compared between the two.

I enjoyed the topic of Pope's more. But for who gave the better show, it was Carey. I don't participate in the major feeding frenzies. like when that singer dude (Robbie somethingorother...."Mikeonabike"). The questions that were answered were ridiculous, but then again he is a minor pop star. What does he really know about the content?
edit on 4-9-2013 by bigfatfurrytexan because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2013 @ 08:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by The GUT
They're both former, ahem, intel operatives. Neither one seems to have a real clue. Make of it what you will.


I have to wonder about that as well. Even if they were in intel if they really knew anything substantial they're not going to tell you the truth. I know a few retired folks who do not discuss their former positions outside of the family, let alone any secret details. No disrespect to either of the guests intended but I often wonder if public figures such as they are a PR smoke screen intended to give the interested public just enough tittilating information to draw their focus away from more important questions. JMHO, take it for what it's worth.




top topics
 
2

log in

join