It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by Rex282
The premise of your argument is... God is not perfect because Gods creation is not perfect
Originally posted by Lichter daraus
If every thing was perfect nothing would exist.
reply to post by logical7
You also used TIME as factor to judge God's perfection. That is just wrong as time is a creation and not an independent entity which has to be obeyed by God too. You said that at a certain point God was doing nothing and 10sec later He Created the Universe which is again wrong, time didnt exist before Universe.
I disagree.
this cosmos is *not* the Original
but a fallen bad copy, image.
Roamed by myriads of for us invisible evil entities
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Only God is perfect right? So if the universe is perfect, it must be God. We are part of the universe, so we are part of God, the conscious part. We are God experiencing itself subjectively in my opinion.
Jesus commands us to be perfect as God is perfect.
Only God is perfect right? So if the universe is perfect, it must be God. We are part of the universe, so we are part of God, the conscious part. We are God experiencing itself subjectively in my opinion.
Originally posted by tinfoilman
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by greavsie1971
Only God is perfect right? So if the universe is perfect, it must be God. We are part of the universe, so we are part of God, the conscious part. We are God experiencing itself subjectively in my opinion.
Is the universe perfect? Your logic depends on an assumption that I'm not sure we can prove one way or the other.edit on 5-9-2013 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
That would imply that God is not the only perfect thing in existence. God is all in all, meaning he is everything, including the universe.
Originally posted by Lone12
reply to post by jiggerj
...your thoughtline has 2 Flaws, Jigger, thats why you come to this False conclusion:
first, you do not understand the nature of God, at all ;
since someone who is full of love only desires to ADD. Share.
and therefore Creates to Can Share.
...the 'self complacent', having-enough-on-himself option, is fitting for Zeus [ enki]
second
this cosmos is *not* the Original
but a fallen bad copy, image.
Roamed by myriads of for us invisable evil entities
[calling them eufemistically ' extraterrestials' dont make their dark nature any better]
its théir cosmos - not His '.
hope that helps.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by jiggerj
This is why I love your threads. It's always a fun 'deep thought' involved ...
Can a Perfect Being make an imperfect universe. The answer - of course.
- what is perfect to us is different than what is perfect to a Perfect Being.
- it may be the seemingly imperfect aspects of the universe that are in fact perfect to the Perfect Beings plan. The bigger plan may be perfect and in need of - what looks like - imperfection to achieve the perfection.
- who knows??
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by jiggerj
This is why I love your threads. It's always a fun 'deep thought' involved ...
Can a Perfect Being make an imperfect universe. The answer - of course.
- what is perfect to us is different than what is perfect to a Perfect Being.
- it may be the seemingly imperfect aspects of the universe that are in fact perfect to the Perfect Beings plan. The bigger plan may be perfect and in need of - what looks like - imperfection to achieve the perfection.
- who knows??
No, no, no. The question is: COULD a perfect god, who is perfectly self-contained and perfectly self-sustaining, create ANYTHING without that thing being derived from a need or a want? If a god has needs and wants, then he cannot be in a state of perfection.
Originally posted by Lone12
*grin*
jigger...why you keep trying to imagine that you are Right in how God should think ?
look
if yóu wanted to create a female for yourself -
would you create a nagging frankenstein
or a lovely model ?
i assume the latter - or one must be Sick -
so... it is love that creates..right ?
and love creates Perfect
and you call 'having a surplus of love' a "state of imperfection"...? c'mon
- that, áfter, that Perfect Original FELL - into this present flesh frame - is quite another story.
but its quite irrational, to base your premisse on disregarding the difference between Original and the Fall -
it just keeps getting you the wrong outcome