It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


High Level Source Confirms Secret US Nuclear Warhead Transfer

page: 2
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in


posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 08:46 PM
reply to post by EA006

March warheads down streets to puff up America's chest?

posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 08:59 PM
This is not something they would do with a chatty truck driver. Such a move would include escorts and all kinds of safety precautions in place. Can you imagine transporting these like you do any load? I don't see that happening.

posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 09:02 PM

Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by MrSpad

They have small nuclear warheads now that can be fit on a jet that are strategic weapons and are not classified as WMDs. These don't need all the paperwork to transfer. The article does not have to be wrong, it could just could be normal transfers occurring and nothing to worry about.

I could be wrong though, this is just a semi-logiocal uninformed wild guess.

you are one hundred percent correct.

during my time a weapons move was done three ways, one way was a short move, done in force with full security from the magazine to the hanger or flight line, or by helio to the carrier also done in force with full security, and what we use to call the super truck for long distance transfers.

if they went by the super truck, there was plenty of security. and as far as i know these were the people who moved them. Office of Secure Transportation

i never heard of them being moved without a ton of paperwork. every weapons move is one thing that is very well documented. and a nuke is not like 16 billion dollars that goes missing, somebody at the pentagon knows where they are at all times.

this is one of the duty stations that i was at. scroll down and read the story the site owner wrote pretty much described to a tee what happens that is visible to the public. Yellow Water

edit on 3-9-2013 by hounddoghowlie because: (no reason given)

posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 09:04 PM

This is not something they would do with a chatty truck driver.

They would give guy fake cargo as a diversion. Quite often things are not as they seem, much less as stated.

Maybe this is just more internet talk. Who knows what to believe anymore.

posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 09:27 PM
Whats on Syrian news ?
satellite images of a truck moving WMD's
watch out they may just strike first for humanitarian reasons

posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 09:28 PM
I have been avoiding spreading fear porn....but I have this uncanny feeling that a nuke is being planned to be used in the ME.

I made a thread before talking about it some but had to phrase it so as to be a hypothetical situation for a nuke being usd in the ME.

I didn't want to outright say that a nuke WAS going to be used, though that is exactly what I feel. I have since yesterday.

I think people are thinking about it. I am slightly tuned to hear peoples thoughts/ emotions.

Yeah I know I sound like a complete idiot nut job, but I don't care. I know what I feel and how correct it has been in the past when I feel this.

I expect a single nuke to go off.
edit on 3-9-2013 by tadaman because: (no reason given)

posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 09:47 PM
INFOWARS!!!! Enough said. I dont know if you are new to this site or not but ANYTHING from either Infowars or anything from someone called Sorcha Faal are COMPLETE BULL#!!!!!!

Originally posted by Agent008
Did search nothing came up. Getting this info out as soon as possible.

A high level source inside the military has now confirmed to us that Dyess Air Force base is actively moving nuclear warheads to the East Coast of the United States in a secret transfer that has no paper trail. According to the high level military source, who has a strong record of continually being proven correct in deep military activity, the Dyess Air Force Commander authorized unknown parties to transfer the nuclear warheads to an unknown location that has been reported to be South Carolina, where the warheads will then be picked up and potentially utilized. This is of particular interest not only due to the fact that the Syrian situation has escalated to the point of a very realistic hot war scenario, but due to the fact that Dyess has repeatedly denied the existence of nuclear warheads inside the base. The brief report from the top level military source, which was written in a rush to get the information out, reads: “Dyess is beginning to move out nuclear war heads today. I got a tap from DERMO earlier. He said it was the first time they have been even acknowledged since being put there in the 80′s. No signature was required for transfer… There was no directive. He said that Dyess Commander was on site to give authority to release. No one knew where they were going really, but the truck driver said to take them to South Carolina and another pick up will take them from there.”

posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 10:02 PM
Comon people! This is a conspiracy site!

These nukes, leaving no traces, being sent from a launch site from the west to a non-launch site to the east might be used for a detonation on the east coast.

What's the name of the one saying that there was going to be an unprecedented catastrophe, a Janet N?

Who would dare to say no to an open war?


No proof nor nothing else. Just saying.

posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 10:02 PM
reply to post by princeofpeace

How about instead of writing in CAPS you help uncover the truth.

No I am not new to this site thank you for your concern, but I got this

I'm just posting news as it comes up on the Syria topic right now. To bring information to the attention of the best panel of truth seekers.
So chill dude and join the conversation.

posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 10:38 PM
Interesting, but I don't trust the source.

However, I used to be stationed in Charleston, SC when I was in the Navy.

Naval Weapons Station, Charleston, SC, which is actually located in Goose Creek, SC.

I lived in housing there. Used to get REALLY annoyed when they move "special" weapons.

There's a set of rail road tracks. Security would move out and block all traffic with their APCs, mounted with .50 machine guns. LOTS of security. Then they would very slowly.....very slowly, roll the flat bed with missile containers from one side of the base to the other, crossing Red Bank Rd.

At least that was how they did it in the 90's. You can still see the bunkers if you use Google Earth.......

The base is still active:

The Support Activity has expanded its mission and Department of Defense support role with over 40 tenant commands, and today is a training center, with the Naval Nuclear Power Training Command (NNPTC), Nuclear Power Training Unit, Propulsion Facility, and Border Patrol satellite academy; Naval Consolidated Brig, Charleston; Mobile Mine Assembly Unit; Explosive Ordnance Detachments; Marine Corps Reserve Center; an engineering complex, with the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center (SPAWAR, this is the largest employer in the Charleston area) and is close to the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast; 269 above-ground ammunition magazines, maintenance and storage of military ordnance including mines, and serves as an Army logistics hub, the busiest continental United States surface port in the defense transportation system. In addition, NWS Charleston contains more than 1,800 on-base houses for Navy enlisted and officer dependents as well as Coast Guard dependents, and has a child care facility, elementary and middle schools.

Find it rather silly that anyone can take the article seriously. I can tell you: movement of "special" weapons was done quite securely and never with any announcements to anyone (at least we took OPSEC seriously).

Our standard answer to anyone that asked was:

"I can neither confirm, nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons on board (insert name of ship here)."

A bragging truck driver?...............

Well if you believe that....I've got a bridge I need to sell.........

posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 10:54 PM

Originally posted by roadgravel

This is not something they would do with a chatty truck driver.

They would give guy fake cargo as a diversion. Quite often things are not as they seem, much less as stated.

Maybe this is just more internet talk. Who knows what to believe anymore.

It is difficult to know what to believe. This is because of the secrecy and deception fed to us. If they are moving nuclear weapons I don't know why - as someone pointed out; where they were is fine for putting them anywhere in the world you want them to be (launch wise). Why move them. I know they are sending some military to Japan (with nuclear training being done in a hurry). I'm assuming that's for Fukushima so what our government is doing is beyond me.

posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 12:05 AM
FEMA has ordered massive quantities of emergency supplies to FEMA Region 3 (East Coast - includes Washington D.C.) to be delivered by October 1st, 2013.

edit on 4-9-2013 by avatar01 because: (no reason given)

posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 01:47 AM
The rumor mill around Abilene(where I currently reside) is that in an all out war, we would be hit because of Dyess so I wouldn't doubt one bit that nukes are there but if they're moving them and why? Good, get em the hell outta here before Russia and China drop a damn warhead less than a mile away from my wife and I.....

posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 03:19 AM
Generally speaking the military doesn't announce its moving nukes around.

Would you rather move a nuke with a covert team in an unmarked car that no one knows about, or get the trumpets out ands sing it to the world there will be a real nuclear weapon on the streets between point A and point B

Not saying it is not shady, but moving nukes quietly sounds like a smart thing to do.

EDIT: they put Manning away for leaking stuff in the past, how much jail time do you get for revealing where live nukes are?!?!?
edit on 4-9-2013 by Biigs because: (no reason given)

posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 03:21 AM
What a load of utter crap. Really? I mean really, people still use that site and claim it's a reliable trustworthy source?

How many times is Alex Jones going to cry wolf before people wake up and realize he is just a scam artist scamming you all with bulldust then selling you dvd's and books and what ever other paraphernalia he sells?

Every time there is the chance the US will attack some country, he comes out with stories about some high level super duper secret source of his who has told him personally because you know, it's Alex Jones, why wouldn't you tell him and only him?...that this or that is happening..
Quite often it's the nuclear weapons are being moved without proper authorization or whatever.

The guy is just scamming everyone. I'm surprised more people haven't caught on to that fact.

I mean really, what does he actually say or do?
Besides regurgitating the same old conspiracy theories.
He even appeared on that idiotic show Conspiracy Theory by Jesse Ventura. The tall guy with the pony tail, ex navy seal whatever, who tries to act out his outrage over what these conspiracies. He should have taken up some acting classes first.

posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 03:33 AM
reply to post by Agent008

Can you give us more substantial news than InforWars? Is this the best you can provide in terms of the true news?
I am disappointed in you......

posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 03:59 AM
reply to post by iBallinU

While i really hate to make this argument, i would question Alex Jones on a lot of what he says but it does seem as if he has some interesting contacts for information. Look at the large number of interviews he does with RT...perhaps his source is Russian?

posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 04:57 AM
The entire article is based on speculation. I watched the video and I find it to be a performance. More like to sell his prison planet channel and whatnot.

posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 04:59 AM
reply to post by tadaman

Any feelings on where this nuke will detonate ?

posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 05:11 AM
reply to post by avatar01

That's an interesting video. I just don't know how unusual each task really is.
They're always stocking up on emergency supplies. Maybe the east coast ran out after hurricane sandy and they are restocking in preparation of the hurricane season that doesn't end until November. It's expected to intensify in September.

I'm a bit concerned with " all metropolitan cities will need support for the Extreme Climate Change". Wtf? What could possibly cause that in a war. Is that a nuclear winter? I hope to God nukes aren't going to be fired our way.

Or is this person just another fear mongerer ?
edit on 4-9-2013 by violet because: (no reason given)

new topics

top topics

<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in