Carl Munck - The Code

page: 3
17
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 7 2013 @ 08:30 PM
link   
Bumping this thread because the videos are fascinating.


ETA: One thing I had an idea about after his discussion of Hoagland and Cydonia, someone should try a map of the heavens as an overlay on Earth using Giza/Orion as 0, 0, 0. It might give us key locations of other sites/artifacts.
edit on 9/7/2013 by suz62 because: (no reason given)
edit on 9/7/2013 by suz62 because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 12:34 AM
link   
reply to post by ArdenWolf
 


I'm sorry your question was actually very helpful and I was generalizing and didn't mean to offend you at all. Please keep in mind that the equator has never moved and the grid latitudes of these sites have not moved either. He claims this system and Giza are around 12,000 years old according to the math, as opposed to the 3,500 BC date given by mainstream archaeology.

There just isn't enough evidence for continental drifting if any during this 12,000 period, in my opinion. It is far from an exact science unfortunately. Even if it has moved slightly, a lot of these sites are gigantic enough that they would still fall on the grid points.

He proposes that Great Pyramid was the ancient Prime Meridian, instead of our modern Greenwich Prime Meridian. If you disregard this, then his theory falls apart. If we plug these numbers into our modern PM, the equations fail. However what he is proposing shows in geomathematics, that these places have in fact not drifted since the mandate to build. At least not enough to be noticeable.
edit on 8-9-2013 by roncoallstar because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 01:13 PM
link   
reply to post by roncoallstar
 

I've watched the first 15 minutes and had to stop. As others have pointed out, what you see here is "law of small numbers" in full action. He is picking numbers to fit the result he expects.

Btw his Stonehenge coordinates seem to be off, just checked them in google maps and cross-checked with wikipedia. To get the correct value he would have to use 360 * 62 and not 360 * 60 (ignoring any plate tectonics here).

PS:
If you are into numbers, I'd recomend to have a look into Pi movie, much more entertaining imho



posted on Sep, 8 2013 @ 04:53 PM
link   
reply to post by moebius
 


Nuts. That's what I get for being math stupid.



posted on Sep, 9 2013 @ 12:02 AM
link   
reply to post by moebius
 


Good catch. Something is wrong here. Carl mentions that you need to add +2, but he doesn't show it in his flash card. Check this link and you'll see the correct equation is here that fits into Stonehenge's modern coordinates.
geomathematics

The correct equation would be :
62 x 360 = 22320 ; 22320 / 51 / 10 = 43.76

But Carl shows this:
60 x 360 = 21600 ; 21600 / 51 / 10 = 42.35

He did say he was using detailed source maps, and those maps he was using may have been different than what we have today. I really don't know what to make of this because he claims that those were indeed the correct coordinates of Stonehenge, yet today we have a different number. However, that number fits perfectly if you add the +2 as Carl originally states.



posted on Sep, 10 2013 @ 12:43 PM
link   
bump



posted on Nov, 2 2013 @ 02:57 AM
link   

boncho

Originally posted by roncoallstar
reply to post by boncho
 


Anything like that would be long gone, especially after a worldwide disaster, except for stone that is. And that is exactly what we are left with.


That's strange. So the dinosaur bones we find are what? Just anomalies? You don't think titanium stints pinned into people's legs wouldn't be noticeable? And tools from the stone age...

(My answer is forgetting a million other things like steel, metals, etc.)
edit on 3-9-2013 by boncho because: (no reason given)


We don't find dinosaur bones, we find dinosaur fossils,....which are made out of.......stone.

Next question.



posted on Nov, 2 2013 @ 03:08 AM
link   

Phage
reply to post by roncoallstar
 




Do you think giant blocks of titanium would have been better?

No. Blocks are a pretty silly way of building things unless you don't have other options.
edit on 9/5/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)


How many of our modern steel frame buildings do you think will still be around in 5 thousand years?



posted on Nov, 2 2013 @ 03:39 AM
link   
2 months passed, and this topic and Carl Munck's research still stand as some of the greatest proof of an advanced ancient civilization, and no one will ever know about it.


Well, at least Carl has opened the eyes of at least one human...



posted on Nov, 2 2013 @ 12:22 PM
link   

JohnnySasaki

boncho

Originally posted by roncoallstar
reply to post by boncho
 


Anything like that would be long gone, especially after a worldwide disaster, except for stone that is. And that is exactly what we are left with.


That's strange. So the dinosaur bones we find are what? Just anomalies? You don't think titanium stints pinned into people's legs wouldn't be noticeable? And tools from the stone age...

(My answer is forgetting a million other things like steel, metals, etc.)
edit on 3-9-2013 by boncho because: (no reason given)


We don't find dinosaur bones, we find dinosaur fossils,....which are made out of.......stone.

Next question.


Well, sorry I didn't realize we were arguing semantics here. I posed more than one question however. So there was an advanced civilization which left no remnants at all?



posted on Nov, 2 2013 @ 12:23 PM
link   

JohnnySasaki

Phage
reply to post by roncoallstar
 




Do you think giant blocks of titanium would have been better?

No. Blocks are a pretty silly way of building things unless you don't have other options.
edit on 9/5/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)




How many of our modern steel frame buildings do you think will still be around in 5 thousand years?




Quite a few most likely, even if they had all fallen by them we would have engineered composites left over.

You are forgetting about the most important thing about historical evidence…
edit on 2-11-2013 by boncho because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2013 @ 05:15 PM
link   
You do realize that almost all metals corrode, right? Ever watch that show "Life After People"? I'm not gonna say everything they had to say was 100% correct, but not much is left even after a relatively short period of time.

What's more, it's well known that the pyramids have been looted.

Next question.



posted on Nov, 5 2013 @ 03:56 PM
link   
No takers? I thought so.

How about this, I want someone to try this on one of our modern buildings,....say the space needle in Seattle for example. It should be fairly easy beings it has a 360 degree circle at the top. You can use all the "small numbers" you want, given that they come off of said space needle in some way, and in a relatively small amount of steps I want you to find the exact coordinates to the space needle in the "CODE".

That should prove your point fairly well.


I'll be waiting.
edit on 5-11-2013 by JohnnySasaki because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2013 @ 07:35 PM
link   
I'm still waiting. I don't have eternity, believe it or not. I'll give it another couple days, at which time I'll assume your silence is conceding defeat.





new topics
top topics
 
17
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join