I have been searching the internet for quite awhile trying to find some information on Carl Munck and this theory. Well in my eyes it isn't so much of
a theory as is it hard evidence. There is literally no interest in these findings to be found anywhere. Neither promoters of the theory nor debunkers.
As far as I can tell it has gone relatively unnoticed and it is time for people to take notice. I do know Carl was on Red Ice Radio in 2012, and he
still supports his theory, as do I.
I have thought about The Code for many years, all the time, since I discovered it years ago. Anyone who is interested in our past, which I assume is a
lot of us here on ATS, needs to watch these videos. Forget all of the fuzzy UFO videos for now, this guy basically proves that the grid matrix is
linked with Cydonia on Mars, among a number of other things. If you disagree, please try and debunk it by all means. If there is a flaw in his theory
I would like to see it.
As it stands this is proof of a number of things until somehow debunked.
1. The pyramids were not tombs, and the rest of the ancient megalithic structures on earth are not what archaeologists say they are. They are built
precisely where they are for a reason, and shaped the way they are for a reason. That reason has nothing to with ceremonial purposes, or anything else
the scientists claim.
2. These ancient people were as smart or smarter than us, most likely with the capability of flight and high tech tools in order to survey the entire
earth and build construction sites on precise locations. Without knowing how large the earth was, and where the land was and was not, the grid matrix
system would not have been logically possible. They would have needed to know the earth just as well as we do today in order to achieve such a feat.
3. Either us or a lost civilization has been to Mars before, or came from Mars.
Until someone else can debunk this theory completely, I would have to say with certainty that this is in fact truth. I see no sign of deception and
foul play in his work, and it seems no one else has been able to either for almost 20 years.
As for the subject of continental drift, I have come to the conclusion that this theory is all over the place, and the science behind it is not solid
enough to prove anything as far as accurate numbers, especially in the past. We don't know how long ago this matrix was created, and we don't know the
rate of continental drift if any at that time.
Please, someone take the time to watch these so it may be debated instead of disappearing into obscurity again.
edit on 4-9-2013 by roncoallstar because: (no reason given)