posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 12:08 AM
02/09/13: President Hollande is constitutionally able to order an attack without parliamentary approval.
French MPs are due to debate the issue in an extraordinary session of parliament on Wednesday. However, Mr Ayrault has ruled out a vote.
I wonder if this “Beloved Unpopular Leader” Has learnt any “lessons” from Britain's government which let the inconvenient institution called
parliamentary Democracy, intervene against bombing “freedom” into Syria’s people?
Most French people do not want France to take part in
military action on Syria and most do not trust French President Francois Hollande to do so, a poll showed on Saturday.
If president Hollande orders his recession hit France into attacking Syria, is there any possibility (even if only decades into the future) that his
ideological opponents will have the then x-president Hollande trailed, as a war criminal for getting militarily involved without U.N approval
(something Tony Blair avoided through Resolution 1441 news.bbc.co.uk...
He certainly has the propaganda of one in the form of a Dodgy Dossier…
France says the chemical attack near Damascus last month "could not have been ordered and carried out by anyone but the Syrian
A report presented to parliament by Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault says the assault on 21 August involved the "massive use of chemical agents".
Earlier Russian analysis showed the chemical agent used in one attack was not factory made…
10/07/2013: Evidence studied by Russian
scientists indicates that a projectile carrying the deadly nerve agent sarin was most likely fired at Khan al-Assal by the rebels, Churkin pointed
“It was determined that on March 19 the rebels fired an unguided missile Bashair-3 at the town of Khan al-Assal, which has been under government
control. The results of the analysis clearly show that the shell used in Khan al-Assal was not factory made and that it contained sarin,” he
Churkin added that the contents of the shell “didn’t contain chemical stabilizers in the toxic substance,” and therefore “is not a standard
chemical charge.” The RDX - an explosive nitroamine commonly used for industrial and military applications - found in the warhead was not consistent
with what the armed forces use. rt.com...
So I wonder whether Frances dossier conducted any such analysis? Certainly none I’m not as yet aware of, despite looking at bits of their propaganda
document on Google Translate.
On the Bright Side: I Might Be wrong…
Apparently it’s morally desirable for recession hit France to kill, since the targeted people will be Assad’s conscripted soldiers –people
actually engaged in fighting a bunch of religious fighters calling themselves “Rebels”
but whose fighters (people actually on the ground)
have little motivation-focus on Western liberalism, yet are instead united in war because: Assad’s a Shiite, and they’re Sunni Muslim (many of
whose branches are fanatical enough to literally be Al-Qaeda).
Rebels Have Long Possessed Chemicals Weapons…
16/12/12: Last week, fighters from a group that the Obama administration has branded a
terrorist organization were among rebels who seized the Sheik Suleiman military base near Aleppo, where research on chemical weapons had been
conducted. Rebels are also closing in on another base near Aleppo, known as Safirah, which has served as a major production center for such munitions,
according to U.S. officials and analysts. articles.washingtonpost.com...