*LIVESTREAM* 9/3/13 2:30 PM EST - Senate Foreign Relations Committee HEARING on SYRIA. starring...

Did I miss rand speak?

The excuse for American's being in direct danger is weak as well. Take them out of the area! Why is this not an option? No more America at risk.

Did i just hear that right?

The foreign relations representative just said the Assad supports Al-Qaeda. Really? That terrorist organization that is fighting alongside the rebels against the Syrian regime?

reply to post by MDDoxs


Uhg, they better not be trying to sell that nonsense... Unbelievable.

Originally posted by MDDoxs
Did i just hear that right?

The foreign relations representative just said the Assad supports Al-Qaeda. Really? That terrorist organization that is fighting alongside the rebels against the Syrian regime?

You are talking about Rubio right? yes he just said that, which is a complete joke.

What Rubio is doing is appealing to his neocon masters by saying that we need to be more militarily adventurous while appealing to the Republican base by APPEARING to be skeptical of Obama's plan.

Anybody else sense that Rubio is getting dry mouth? Some one pass him a bottle of poland springs.

reply to post by eLPresidente


Yea Rubio,

He is very annoying and pandering. It almost sounds as if he is trying to direct the conversation to expand US involvement in Syria....

Everything's better with blue bonnet on it !!

Sounds like we're getting 'buttered up' real good now !!





Viva La France !

Originally posted by eLPresidente

Originally posted by MDDoxs
Did i just hear that right?

The foreign relations representative just said the Assad supports Al-Qaeda. Really? That terrorist organization that is fighting alongside the rebels against the Syrian regime?

You are talking about Rubio right? yes he just said that, which is a complete joke.

What Rubio is doing is appealing to his neocon masters by saying that we need to be more militarily adventurous while appealing to the Republican base by APPEARING to be skeptical of Obama's plan.

Anybody else sense that Rubio is getting dry mouth? Some one pass him a bottle of poland springs.

Unless I misheard him, did he chew out Kerry regarding the lack of concern for the first 100,000 people killed? My jaw kind of hit the floor for a minute here.

reply to post by MDDoxs


Wondering the same thing...... Did Rand speak? Has anyone spoken yet that is AGAINST THIS ???????

Originally posted by MDDoxs
Did i just hear that right?

The foreign relations representative just said the Assad supports Al-Qaeda. Really? That terrorist organization that is fighting alongside the rebels against the Syrian regime?

Al Qaeda is playing on both sides, I just started a thread on this yesterday, quoted 3 sources but no one has been interested. www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by Jusvistn


I haven't seen Rand speak yet.

reply to post by CottonwoodStormy


I will check it out, thanks.

reply to post by MDDoxs


Thank you!

There, he said it, the goal to help oust assad, afterwards naturally there will be boots on the ground because the civil war is over and the chemical weapons are not allowed to fall in the hands of Al Qaida.

That is how i understand it.

Originally posted by earthling42
There, he said it, the goal to help oust assad, afterwards naturally there will be boots on the ground because the civil war is over and the chemical weapons are not allowed to fall in the hands of Al Qaida.

That is how i understand it.

lmfao who in their right minds could possibly believe that bull?

they will screw everything possible up on this, it will be the end of many things we hold near and dear, but then again it seems their plan and they totally ignore their constituents as well. between this and Fukushima i wouldn't bother worrying about any thing any longer because it's F'ing over.

what stands out to me is when Kerry was asked, how do we know chemical weapons haven't already fallen into the wrong hands like Hezbollah, Kerry states he prefers to discuss that in classified tomorrow, meaning, they already have or else he would have just said no.


meaning, further action is most definitely inevitable.

Oh gawd,

Kerry just used the "Founding Fathers" line to explain why Obama deferred to the decision to congress, while he said he could act without it.

Oh if only the founding fathers could see how things have been twisted

reply to post by MDDoxs


rolling in their graves.

Now if Kerry said, if there was no intervention, civilians could be in danger of more chemical weapon attacks, i would have almost believe him.
Not this propagande he spouts about pjong jang, iranian dancing in the street and others scratching their head.

Kerry just said there's no hidden agenda re: Syria. Just how f***ing stupid does he think people are? We all can see straight through the wool, buddy.