The image John Kerry WON'T want you to see

page: 2
61
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 2 2013 @ 12:34 PM
link   
One positive thing about Obama and Kerry's bumbling is that it is waking some people up who have been sleeping their entire lives. More people are awaking to the corruption that is infesting our government on all sides.




posted on Sep, 2 2013 @ 12:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by intrepid
NOW, the partisan crap starts. Even though Assad wasn't seen as a problem in 2009, it's being purported that the Dem's are in league with him TODAY. It's easily seen by those that don't buy a "bill of goods."


I'm not making any partisan implications; I could just as well have said Bush and Cheney will have dinner and laugh with Assad later; although Cheney can't travel much anymore because he's wanted for war crimes all over the world.

I believe partisanship is another illusion perpetuated by the media arm of the government to distract the people from real issues and keep them feeling like they have some freedom of choice in government.



posted on Sep, 2 2013 @ 01:59 PM
link   
reply to post by InTheFlesh1980
 
Thank you for your deeper thoughts. I find we are seeing our world power structure in similar ways. However, I think we differ in examples, such as this, of that power structure.

As much as so many of us lament the loss of a viable press, be it print or whatever, I think it is important to understand the difference between good press and poor press. One of the things that bad press does is use filler pieces. Stuff that is basically meaningless to any issue and is nothing more than just thumb twiddling because there is nothing new to print. Even good media falls into this. The picture and little story that is tied to it, to my mind is nothing more than this. Filler. There is no proof that they are in deep conversation. They might just as easily be talking about the latest Simpsons episode while thinking about how the others guys wife would be in the sack. We just don't know.

I feel that concerning ourselves with what every little picture and slip of the tongue MIGHT mean can drive us crazy. There is enough hard information out there to keep us busy already. This kind of press,I think, does nothing but obfuscate the plethora of information already available.



posted on Sep, 2 2013 @ 02:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Xeven
 


Obama's bumbling is most assuredly proving fodder for a large number of our brethren who consider themselves to be conservative who are now coming to an understanding of the world's power structure as it is manifesting itself before our very eyes.

Bush'es bumbling provided the same fodder for many who consider themselves to be liberal. To those who abhor Obama I offer that though many Obama supporters from the left still do support him, a very large number no longer do. I think this is because they are beginning to see a larger picture. Conservatives should take note of this.

I can only hope that those on the right who are so ready to support the next right wing wunderkind will have the same ability to see this larger perspective once their new hero turns on them like Obama and Bush did.



posted on Sep, 2 2013 @ 02:18 PM
link   
Ye still dont see the real target?



posted on Sep, 2 2013 @ 02:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by intrepid

Originally posted by benrl

Originally posted by ken10
This is how the West works, they befriend you then stab you in the back and mug you.......Ask Qaddafi........Oops too late.
edit on 2-9-2013 by ken10 because: (no reason given)


Or Saddam and Mubarak from egypt... both US former buddies.


And what is the first move in making an ally an enemy? Get the PR arm of the government, er, I mean the MSM, to "educate" the masses as to the foibles of the new target.


It's so easy when MSM is owned, Even the BBC which IS owned but by the people are more and more afraid to go in depth any more, and the crazy use of theatricals, like some geezer blowing smoke out of shot, as if to make a point.



posted on Sep, 2 2013 @ 04:18 PM
link   
reply to post by ken10
 

Kadaffi?

Try asking Osama, Saddam, Mubarak. Did I miss any? I'm sure I did.



posted on Sep, 2 2013 @ 05:20 PM
link   
reply to post by InTheFlesh1980
 


Ohhh! Who would dine with an evil person like Assad?



posted on Sep, 2 2013 @ 05:24 PM
link   
reply to post by jam321
 


I'm sure it is common practice to meet with future enemies to discuss diplomatic matters, for example, Putin visited the U.K. a while back and such.



posted on Sep, 2 2013 @ 05:32 PM
link   
reply to post by darkbake
 





Yes....It does.

BTW, Theres only one out of this group still in power.




posted on Sep, 2 2013 @ 07:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by darkbake
 





Yes....It does.

BTW, Theres only one out of this group still in power.




tallest man!



posted on Sep, 2 2013 @ 08:37 PM
link   
reply to post by InTheFlesh1980
 


Hmmm sounds familiar




posted on Sep, 2 2013 @ 09:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Merlin Lawndart
 


Haven't wondered how deep the corruption goes for a long time.

It goes past the soles of their feet.

It goes to the depths of their hollow black demonized hearts.



posted on Sep, 2 2013 @ 11:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by InTheFlesh1980
I just saw this article and some photos:

Article: The image John Kerry WON'T want you to see

John Kerry and his wife having dinner with Assad and his wife in 2009.


Waiter bringing some nice tasty refreshments for the double-daters:


Well, what do you think? I think it smells!


Sorry if this has already been posted.... did a search as usual.
edit on 2-9-2013 by InTheFlesh1980 because: Fix



I don't get why Kerry wouldn't want us to see this. He lead a delegation designed to seek peace with Syria. You don't go on a trip like that and act undiplomatic asshole. You are there and attempt to improve relations, sometimes that means dinner with the wives. This is real life big kids stuff here. In real life global politics, you meet with real life global leaders.

Only the most irrationally biased can soak up this type of sensationalized political non sense. If you think someone can be a future problem, and you don't send out a delegation, then your country is failing. Sending out a delegation is the right thing to do.
edit on 2-9-2013 by mahatche because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2013 @ 11:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by InTheFlesh1980Kerry, Obama, and others will have dinner with Assad in a couple of years and they'll all laugh together about when they had to stage a media circus and villify him for some globalist financial agenda.


Remember that time we killed 100,000 people, then double downed?



posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 12:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by darkbake
 





Yes....It does.

BTW, Theres only one out of this group still in power.



Wow, it is like one of those photographs from a camp or college or something where everyone in it is disappearing one-by-one. And do you mean besides Obama?



posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 12:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by mahatche

Originally posted by InTheFlesh1980
I just saw this article and some photos:

Article: The image John Kerry WON'T want you to see

John Kerry and his wife having dinner with Assad and his wife in 2009.


Waiter bringing some nice tasty refreshments for the double-daters:


Well, what do you think? I think it smells!


Sorry if this has already been posted.... did a search as usual.
edit on 2-9-2013 by InTheFlesh1980 because: Fix



I don't get why Kerry wouldn't want us to see this. He lead a delegation designed to seek peace with Syria. You don't go on a trip like that and act undiplomatic asshole. You are there and attempt to improve relations, sometimes that means dinner with the wives. This is real life big kids stuff here. In real life global politics, you meet with real life global leaders.

Only the most irrationally biased can soak up this type of sensationalized political non sense. If you think someone can be a future problem, and you don't send out a delegation, then your country is failing. Sending out a delegation is the right thing to do.
edit on 2-9-2013 by mahatche because: (no reason given)


Wait... by delegation for "peace", you mean delegation for "pipeline", right?



posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 01:20 AM
link   
Don't forget about the UKs contribution. Blair and his vile wife were the Assads favourite couple and three members of that foul foursome were born here. Not forgetting that the egalitarian, caring, nice guy, socialist posterboy spent a pleasant night camping out in a huge tent with his best mate Qaddafi.



posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 02:05 AM
link   
reply to post by ken10
 



Originally posted by ken10
This is how the West works, they befriend you then stab you in the back and mug you.......Ask Qaddafi........Oops too late.


Yep. According to the Huffington Post, Qaddafi definitely got stabbed in the back(side).
OUCH!


Word to the wise: Don't make Barry mad!

Sorry, I just couldn't resist...

Dex



posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 02:05 AM
link   
-Swingers.
It all makes sense now. Kerry never wanted to swap back and now we will ALL pay the price.





top topics
 
61
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join