It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bodrul
i am against for the following reason
the pound is stronger then the euro because its worth $1.86 as the euro is worth $1.45
Originally posted by Tartessian
It is true that London acts as the financial center of the EU, where most financial firms have their HQ's, but the majority of such firms are foreign.
There were some continental attempts to create a financial center, but they haven't yet materialized, i guess it is hard to decide.
Onve (if) London ceases to be the main financial center of Europe, the value of the pound will dramatically devalue,
as such ,accepting the UK into the euro at this stage would mean filling the purses of the UK citizens at the expense of the Continent.
Originally posted by bodrul
ok guys blair wants us to use EURO's
who's against
and
who's for
and why
i am against for the following reason
the pound is stronger then the euro because its worth $1.86 as the euro is worth $1.45
Originally posted by shorty
Im against the EU so im against the Euro.
Originally posted by Paul
I'd vote to keep the pound. I'm not against a European Union; the reduced red tape, business links, free trade, free movement of people are all beneficial.
I do think though, that all countries in the union should maintain their own currencies, sovereignty and economic policy control.
Originally posted by Elfwood
I would have no problem in the UK (or even just Scotland) adopting the euro.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
What if the UK 'Home nations' decided they wanted to use Euros and England alone did not?
Why should the rest UK have to go along with England's lone decision?
Originally posted by UK Wizard
The decision to join the euro should be put to a national referedum for the whole of the UK not just single countries.
Englands such an evil country isn't it hording all the wealth
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
- Why?
England as the major part of the UK has spent centuries aggressively constructing a 'union' on her terms.
This is, IMO, probably the true root of the 'little-englander' tory attitudes to Europe, nothing but pure paranoia that the nations of the EU will in that union treat England in the manner that England has treated the 'Home Nations' historically in hers.
Originally posted by UK Wizard
Why not?
So you'd be happier if the UK never existed?
I was wondering how long it would take to blame the Tory's
Originally posted by muppet
"The Rest of the World" is a bigger, more vibrant, faster growing club than the EU.
Britain has always looked way beyond Europe in it's ambitions.
To succeed on the world stage we have to retain our independence and not be tied by the trade agreements, tariffs, and protectionism promoted by the EU.
It's also important that we keep control of monetary policy (i.e. interest rates), something we would lose if we gave up the sterling.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
This is not a case of simply the EU on the one hand and a totally freely trading 'rest of the world' on the other.
To paraphrase Churchill - until someone finds the means to uproot Britiain and anchor her far away from continental Europe's shores Europe will always be Britain's priomary focus in the world.
- I suggest before you get too carried away with this kind of convincing sounding rhetoric
We have very little 'economic sovereignty' alone, by joining the Euro we gain a much greater degree of actual influence and control by pooling the little we have now.
Originally posted by muppet
that is exactly WHY we should stay out. We would be free to engage in agreements that suit our economy.
What is it that we have so little of right now that we need to "pool"?