Some of you may have seen small segments of this before in a thread I created about a year ago. That thread got ruined when plagiarism notices were
added to the op and more than half the op was removed. My error was not labeling my own work! therefore it was assumed to be someone else’s and
hence the notices. I contacted the staff and the notices were removed, but the content was never replaced and the thread no longer made any sense.
This is not a repeat of that thread, it’s Part 2
This thread is about numbers, and whether they are just a coincidence, or whether there’s a reason for them.
First lets look at the Moon.
The distance between the Moon and the earth varies a little each year, and I know that over time that distance has grown, however, it seems remarkable
that at the very moment when man becomes able to measure and confirm these distances accurately, the moon has moved to a position that often causes
the perfect eclipse.
An eclipse that is often so perfect that the moon appears to be the exact same size as the sun.
why we all marvel at these events, isn’t it?
To be the exact same size is
quite a coincidence! There’s an infinite amount of space out there, and yet the moon just happens to be at the
only position in our entire universe that enables it to cause the perfect eclipse.
Maybe worthy of note here is the fact the sun is 400 times larger than the moon, and it’s 400 times further away!
The moon is the perfect size to square the circumference of the earth! This discovery was made when a crop circle showed the same method, see the link
at bottom of post!
Considering the amazing coincidence of the moons position to cause a perfect eclipse, doesn’t it seem even more amazing that the moon just happens
to be the exact size needed to square the earth? What are the odds of this happening naturally?
If that was the end of these coincidences
then maybe, just maybe, we could allow ourselves to believe that it really is just coincidence?
But there’s more!
Allen Brown (in the crop circle vid linked below) noticed the same method of squaring of the circle could be applied to Stonehenge by creating the
size of the satellite circles from the distance between the inner and outer circle. [Using the original outer ring that’s still visible, but
no-longer has stones above ground].
Drawing from cropcircle vid linked below below.
If we take the earths diameter, 5040 miles, and the earth plus moons radius, 7920 miles, we find that Stonehenge has those same numbers in feet i.e.:
50.4 and 79.2
Now that really is
quite a coincidence! It seems to link Stonehenge with the moon and the earth.
And there’s more!
Remember the numbers we just used? 5040 and 7920 ?
5040 is the first seven numbers multiplied together 1x2x3x4x5x6x7 = 5040
7920 is the next four numbers multiplied together 8x9x10x11 = 7920
And that’s just a coincidence!!
Those same numbers lead us to a crop circle.
Image from cropcicle vid linked below.
The above crop formation has those same numbers. There are 504 standing elements and 792 flattened elements. This crop formation symbolises the DNA
spiral, the squaring of the circle and the relationship between the earth and the moon.
(from vid linked below)
The Great Pyramid
"Imagine someone asking you to create a design containing 504 + 792 elements and make it interesting. To come up with the circle [above] with a
perfect rotating DNA spiral also encoding those numbers is a work of genius, and to find it in a wheat field, beautifully formed, in august, it seems
the most sane way of dealing with this is to accept it demonstrates a level of intelligence and compassion towards us which is pulling us up and we
have to look at it square in the face. I think its truly an extraordinary piece of intelligence and geometry…".
The Great Pyramid in Egypt is another source of numbers that are supposedly just a coincidence too, but what if we can link the great pyramid with all
what we’ve seen above?
If we could find a link are we still to believe its just coincidence?
Remember that above we noticed how the sun and the moon share the number 400? And how the moon, the earth, and Stonehenge share the number 5040 and
7920? Well, we can link Stonehenge with the great pyramid using those numbers!
In the vid (linked below) made by Carl Munck, he shows us that Stonehenge gives us the following.
1. Its own grid reference.
2. The grid reference of the ancient Go-low formation in Germany.
3. The grid reference of the ancient Cuicuilco formation
4. The grid reference of the Great pyramid.
That’s quite a lot of information!
So how is he doing it?
According to Munck the only way to make sense of the maths is to have the prime meridian centered at the great pyramid because the ancients’ prime
meridian was located there at 31dg 8 mins 00.8 seconds east of Greenwich.
Our current Prime meridian is located at Greenwich.
British archaeologists say that in its early stages and before it started to fall apart the outer circle consisted of 60 outer stones, with 30 of them
lying on top. The inner shape was like a horse shoe, it had 10 standing stones and 5 lintels on top.
The numbers above are being offered to us by the monument and they really do seem an obvious choice if we were looking for encoded information. If by
using those numbers we can create meaningful data, and it’s repeatable, that would take us beyond mere coincidence!
I think he’s doing it like this - please correct me if I’m wrong.
The Outer circle is a 360’ arc and it’s created using 60 stones. So we multiply 360 by the number of stones
360 x 60 = 21600
So, we’ve now got the number 21600.
We should note that 21600 is the number of arc minutes for any circle. It’s also the number of miles (nautical)
for the polar circumference of the earth, so it seems to be an interesting number already!
What do we do with it?
Munck noticed the grid latitude of Stonehenge, 51’ 10min North so he tried the following.
He took the 21600 and divided it by the 51
21600 / 51 = 423.5294118
Then he took the 423.5294118 and divided it by the 10min
423.5294118 / 10 = 42.3529
So, he’s used the 51
He’s also used the 10
And he’s got 42.3529
51 deg 10 min 42.3529 sec. This is the exact latitude of Stonehenge
51 x 10 x 42.35294118 = 21600 North
Munck calls the product of a sites Degrees x Minutes x Seconds the Grid Latitude. In this case 21600.
Here’s another one. US.
This multiplies to 40x02x27=2160 Longitude
Remember this 2160
Fort2. The circle has a grid reference of 113 : 24 : 56.22 Latitude.
This multiplies to 216000
Notice the three numbers
Fort 1 2160
Fort 2 216000
Now, rushing back to Stonehenge..
We noted there were 2 formations – the inner and outer circles - so we use the 2.
There are 15 inner standing stones so we use the 15.
There are 60 outer standing stones so we use the 60.
When multiplied (60x2x15) these numbers become 1800
edit on 31-8-2013 by VoidHawk because: (no reason given)