posted on Aug, 30 2013 @ 06:41 PM
Well from my perspective at least there seems to be a lot of conjecture as to who detonated the chemical weapons in Syria, who is actually responsible
is still questionable (if you read sites like ats anyway).
The issue I have with Assads regime being responsible for using the said weapons is contended by the fact, Assads military had gained the upper hand
in the conflict, and if I am not wrong??
could have even been at a point were they had reasonable control of the situation.
Begging the question, why use chemical weapons, when the UN and US had previously stated if chemical weapons are used the UN would intervene..
So as I sit and watch the news in Australia, all I see and hear is how the Assad regime has used chemical weapons on its people.
Very little, if not next to nothing has been released on msm to suggest the rebels might be responsible, in fact the opposite has been reported.
My question to those on the far side of the world, what is your media reporting? Is it a fair assessment or just a one sided spin justifying military
Particularly the UK, what is the msm media reporting there, has it been explained to the public clearly why parliament there opted out of intervention
and what was the reason? We havnt been told
edit on 30-8-2013 by borntowatch because: (no reason given)