It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neo96
Originally posted by muse7
I don't know why he didn't do this sooner.
I agree with both of the actions, the one that closes the loophole where people that are disallowed are able to register their guns to a corporation is a no brainer
Yo?
Did the Aruora Shooter,Sandy Hook shooter, Zimmerman, and every other shooter in the last 5 years
USE GUN TRUSTS ?
Originally posted by neo96
I know some people just hate corporations no matter the cause, but this is PUNISHING people who haven't done jack snip to anyone.
Originally posted by neo96
Originally posted by muse7
I don't know why he didn't do this sooner.
I agree with both of the actions, the one that closes the loophole where people that are disallowed are able to register their guns to a corporation is a no brainer
Yo?
Did the Aruora Shooter,Sandy Hook shooter, Zimmerman, and every other shooter in the last 5 years
USE GUN TRUSTS ?
I know some people just hate corporations no matter the cause, but this is PUNISHING people who haven't done jack snip to anyone.
Support holding the entire country accountable for actions they did not commit ?
Really ?edit on 29-8-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Where does that trunk full of guns come from?
Besides...after the tonnage of NRA rhetoric about how guns stop crime and defend homes...do you really want to argue that all the crime guns used in the USA come from gun owners who failed to secure thier guns and were victims of succesful crimes?
Is it possible that gun-runners use blind trusts to hide thier dealings and identities?
Or that the cash-and-carry vendors at gun-shows set up blind trust entities to sell Military Surplus weapons?
Hell the EO doesn't even ban Gun-Running via blind trust...it simply asks those folks hiding behind the trust to come forward and have thier background checked to make sure they are not known criminals
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by BritofTexas
That ain't spin.
That is truth.
I don't support government fascism unlike some.
Nope...You want to talk about how to keep guns out the hands of those types? The wacko and unqualified contingent? Cuz we tried that and the NRA said hell no
the move signaled Obama's intent to show he hasn't lost sight of the cause he took up after 20 first graders and six adults were gunned down last year in an elementary school in Newtown, Conn
Originally posted by wrabbit2000
reply to post by AlienScience
Alien... have you missed the numerous and frequent statements OUR OWN PRESIDENT has made about his full intention to go around Congress if they won't do what he likes? Have you not noticed Biden, the 2nd most powerful man in the U.S. system for the executive side, saying they WOULD get this done whether Congress cooperated or not?
I'm not in need of proving anything, on any level here. In this case, those being accused aren't simply failing to deny it, they proudly state the fact openly and often.
Is that what we should use as our basis for gun laws? Should we only make things illegal after a tragedy?
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by AlienScience
Is that what we should use as our basis for gun laws? Should we only make things illegal after a tragedy?
Why ?
We already have laws against murder, and hurting people, that doesn't stop it.
So why are we banning things ?
That doesn't stop it either.
Originally posted by BritofTexas
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by BritofTexas
That ain't spin.
That is truth.
I don't support government fascism unlike some.
Not to sure about that last line. But that's a discussion for another thread.
Please tell me how either of the two measures in the OPs article will stop my Grandmother leaving me her favorite Blunderbuss?
Originally posted by AlienScience
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by AlienScience
Is that what we should use as our basis for gun laws? Should we only make things illegal after a tragedy?
Why ?
We already have laws against murder, and hurting people, that doesn't stop it.
So why are we banning things ?
That doesn't stop it either.
You are the one that brought it up, that this doesn't relate to Sandy Hook.
I'm fine with Obama issuing these out of the blue with nothing but common sense to back him up.
Originally posted by thesaneone
reply to post by AlienScience
What do you think this E.O will do to benefit the American people?