reply to post by InsertNameHere
Jumping ahead a bit re debunking. It has long been my opinion that you cannot really investigate or even take a position on something properly
if you start from a subjective basis. This includes preconceptions on items like religion and pre-disposed belief or perceived advantage in some other
foundation that sets a persons stance towards a specific outcome from the off.
Having been personally involved with the contact/abduction enigma, and in the course of my own search for understanding the real nature of my
experience, have become acutely aware of cultural training; humanistic ideologies and the unique or esoteric sense of being an earthy being. These and
many other references form the psycho-spiritual matrix of our complex identities as human beings. It is impossible or rather illogical to attempt to
shed all cultural references in order to be objective. I can count the reasons, but will suffice to say that one can with practice set aside many of
his prejudices, biases and preconceptions, and thereby open his imagination to the possibilities.
I can honestly say for myself (absolutely) that this discipline opens a level of possibilities and knowing that would not otherwise be obtained. We
are fanatics about pretense, evidence, materiality and all of the adjoining synonyms. The fact is that information flows through natural pathways,
tendrils that branch and intersect. Finding some knowledge in one thing seems to lead to another, and so on. The standard for logic, scientific
protocol and hard evidence is great in terms of human knowledge, but it can be intellectually subversive when dealing with non-human knowledge.
That may sound a bit cryptic, and there is allot more to explain, nevertheless there is logic in things illogical
. Everything is explainable
under the right terms (not necessarily our). Everything occurs in patterns and these patterns occur in larger cycles. People are so occupied with
interpreting everything through conventional references, that they miss the uniqueness and thus the meaning of the event. I know this sounds rather
simplistic, it is in a broad sense. That's the really interesting aspect of the relationship between humans beings and these entities who interact
with us. We have long languished in the preoccupation of human things, human thinking and local perception, the human world view. Our nescient self
indulgence has become a matter of indolence against the sanctity of our own environment and thus - diminished future.
Now, very few people I know would agree with such a statement, and only on an intellectual basis, then quickly dismiss it. It is an empirical truth
that is easily justified and yet one that the destiny of the human race is predicated upon. Scientifically, there is no doubt that the current
stagnation of our oceans will lead to an oceanic anoxic event
. The geological record shows these have happened many times in earth's past and
are linked to global warming and mass extinction.
Let us postulate coming in contact with a race of beings who understand this pattern very well, not only from their home planet but by the study of
others. In addition, their technology is based on a deeper knowledge of quantum physics granting them the ability to expound their presence without
disturbing the natural order of the physical world. So, here now is a reality based upon the technical ability to work with underlying forces of the
material world we understand, but which also transcend that materiality. Here we have these other beings who are not subject to dismal rationales
within the limitations of our concrete, earthy subsistence. They have in fact transcended the cesspool of which we are a part.
Knowing the waste that shall come upon the inhabitants of this world, and seeing the utter chaos and general disregard for all of humanity and the
generations to come, what wouldthey
think of us
? Would they judge us as a race of immoral, irresponsible children? If so, how would that
translate through their missions and treatment of us?
So, in the methodology, we have a sort of end point or perhaps an ensign in the correlation of many abductees, in which there is this sort of morality
message, an overt indignation projected upon human subjects rendered helpless, fastened to cold metallic tables, deprived of their most sacred bodily
fluids without the slightest respect for human sovereignty. On the human side, great pride in scientific accomplishment, art, architecture, cultural
traditions, ingenuity, independence and moral freedom. We cannot imagine how so-called advanced beings could be so cruel and emotionally unresponsive.
I think that there is a gift in the deconstruction of certain ensigns and correlations, which come to fruition between naked honesty and rash